Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Hours to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes Converter — cL/h to mm3/min
Convert Centiliter per Hours (cL/h) to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per hours = 166.6666667 cubic millimeter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Hours to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.77777778e-9 / 1.66666667e-11.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Hours to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes
Centiliter per Hours and Cubic Millimeter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per minutes = centiliter per hours × 166.666666667
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per hours equals 2.777778e-9 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 1.666667e-11 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per hours-to-cubic millimeter per minutes factor of 166.666666667.
Simple example
1 cL/h × 166.6666667 = 166.6666667 mm3/min
1 centiliter per hours = 166.6666667 cubic millimeter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 cL/h × 166.6666667 = 10,000 mm3/min
60 centiliter per hours = 10,000 cubic millimeter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Hours (cL/h) | Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/h | 16.66666667 mm3/min |
| 1 cL/h | 166.6666667 mm3/min |
| 10 cL/h | 1,666.666667 mm3/min |
| 60 cL/h | 10,000 mm3/min |
| 100 cL/h | 16,666.66667 mm3/min |
| 1,000 cL/h | 166,666.6667 mm3/min |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Centiliter per Hours
166.6666667 mm3/min × 0.006 = 1 cL/h
166.6666667 cubic millimeter per minutes = 1 centiliter per hours.
centiliter per hours = cubic millimeter per minutes × 0.006
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Centiliter per Hours.
Understanding the Centiliter per Hours (cL/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per minutes are in 1 centiliter per hours?
1 centiliter per hours equals 166.6666667 cubic millimeter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per hours to cubic millimeter per minutes?
Multiply the centiliter per hours value by 166.6666667. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per minutes back to centiliter per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 0.006 centiliter per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per hours?
Centiliter per Hours (cL/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per minutes?
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per hours to cubic millimeter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per hours and cubic millimeter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 166.6666667 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.