Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Hours to Hectoliters per Millisecond Converter — cL/h to hL/ms
Convert Centiliter per Hours (cL/h) to Hectoliter per Millisecond (hL/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per hours = 2.777778e-11 hectoliter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Hours to Hectoliters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.77777778e-9 / 100.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Hours to Hectoliters per Millisecond
Centiliter per Hours and Hectoliter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
hectoliters per millisecond = centiliter per hours × 2.777778e-11
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per hours equals 2.777778e-9 base units, and 1 hectoliter per millisecond equals 100 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per hours-to-hectoliter per millisecond factor of 2.777778e-11.
Simple example
1 cL/h × 2.777778e-11 = 2.777778e-11 hL/ms
1 centiliter per hours = 2.777778e-11 hectoliters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 cL/h × 2.777778e-11 = 1.666667e-9 hL/ms
60 centiliter per hours = 1.666667e-9 hectoliters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Hours (cL/h) | Hectoliter per Millisecond (hL/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/h | 2.777778e-12 hL/ms |
| 1 cL/h | 2.777778e-11 hL/ms |
| 10 cL/h | 2.777778e-10 hL/ms |
| 60 cL/h | 1.666667e-9 hL/ms |
| 100 cL/h | 2.777778e-9 hL/ms |
| 1,000 cL/h | 2.777778e-8 hL/ms |
Reverse conversion: Hectoliter per Millisecond to Centiliter per Hours
2.777778e-11 hL/ms × 36000000000 = 1.00000008 cL/h
2.777778e-11 hectoliters per millisecond = 1.00000008 centiliter per hours.
centiliter per hours = hectoliters per millisecond × 36000000000
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Hectoliter per Millisecond to Centiliter per Hours.
Understanding the Centiliter per Hours (cL/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Hectoliter per Millisecond (hL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many hectoliters per millisecond are in 1 centiliter per hours?
1 centiliter per hours equals 2.777778e-11 hectoliters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per hours to hectoliter per millisecond?
Multiply the centiliter per hours value by 2.777778e-11. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert hectoliter per millisecond back to centiliter per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 hectoliter per millisecond equals 36,000,000,000 centiliter per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per hours?
Centiliter per Hours (cL/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a hectoliter per millisecond?
Hectoliter per Millisecond (hL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per hours to hectoliter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per hours and hectoliter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 2.777778e-11 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.