Centiliter per Hours to Milliliter per Seconds Converter — cL/h to mL/s

Convert Centiliter per Hours (cL/h) to Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per hours = 0.0027777778 milliliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.

Centiliter per Hours to Milliliter per Seconds converter

Converter

Flow Rate Converter

Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.

Result 1 centiliter per hours = 0.0027777778 milliliter per seconds
Advertisement Converter ad slot

Reserved below the result so the calculator remains usable.

From definition

Volumetric flow rate.

To definition

Volumetric flow rate.

Formula

Result = input x 2.77777778e-9 / 1e-6.

Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.

Advertisement Ad slot: content top (728x90)

Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.

About Converting Centiliter per Hours to Milliliter per Seconds

Centiliter per Hours and Milliliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.

Formula

milliliter per seconds = centiliter per hours × 0.00277777777778

This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per hours equals 2.777778e-9 base units, and 1 milliliter per seconds equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per hours-to-milliliter per seconds factor of 0.00277777777778.

Simple example

1 cL/h × 0.002777777778 = 0.0027777778 mL/s

1 centiliter per hours = 0.0027777778 milliliter per seconds.

Real-world example

60 cL/h × 0.002777777778 = 0.1666666667 mL/s

60 centiliter per hours = 0.1666666667 milliliter per seconds.

Conversion table

Centiliter per Hours (cL/h)Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s)
0.1 cL/h0.0002777778 mL/s
1 cL/h0.0027777778 mL/s
10 cL/h0.0277777778 mL/s
60 cL/h0.1666666667 mL/s
100 cL/h0.2777777778 mL/s
1,000 cL/h2.777777778 mL/s

Reverse conversion: Milliliter per Seconds to Centiliter per Hours

0.0027777778 mL/s × 360 = 1.000000008 cL/h

0.0027777778 milliliter per seconds = 1.000000008 centiliter per hours.

centiliter per hours = milliliter per seconds × 360

For a page dedicated to this direction, see Milliliter per Seconds to Centiliter per Hours.

Understanding the Centiliter per Hours (cL/h)

Volumetric flow rate.

Understanding the Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s)

Volumetric flow rate.

Advertisement Ad slot: content middle (728x90)

Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.

Frequently asked questions

How many milliliter per seconds are in 1 centiliter per hours?

1 centiliter per hours equals 0.0027777778 milliliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.

How do I convert centiliter per hours to milliliter per seconds?

Multiply the centiliter per hours value by 0.002777777778. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.

How do I convert milliliter per seconds back to centiliter per hours?

Use the reverse factor: 1 milliliter per seconds equals 360 centiliter per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.

What is a centiliter per hours?

Centiliter per Hours (cL/h) is a unit of flow rate.

What is a milliliter per seconds?

Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) is a unit of flow rate.

Is the centiliter per hours to milliliter per seconds conversion exact?

Yes. Both centiliter per hours and milliliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.002777777778 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.

What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?

Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.