Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Hours to Imperial pints per Fortnight Converter — cL/h to imp pt/fn
Convert Centiliter per Hours (cL/h) to Imperial pint per Fortnight (imp pt/fn) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per hours = 5.912773394 imperial pint per fortnight). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Hours to Imperial pints per Fortnight converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.77777778e-9 / 4.697927e-10.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Hours to Imperial pints per Fortnight
Centiliter per Hours and Imperial pint per Fortnight both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial pints per fortnight = centiliter per hours × 5.91277339428
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per hours equals 2.777778e-9 base units, and 1 imperial pint per fortnight equals 4.697927e-10 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per hours-to-imperial pint per fortnight factor of 5.91277339428.
Simple example
1 cL/h × 5.912773394 = 5.912773394 imp pt/fn
1 centiliter per hours = 5.912773394 imperial pints per fortnight.
Real-world example
60 cL/h × 5.912773394 = 354.7664037 imp pt/fn
60 centiliter per hours = 354.7664037 imperial pints per fortnight.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Hours (cL/h) | Imperial pint per Fortnight (imp pt/fn) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/h | 0.5912773394 imp pt/fn |
| 1 cL/h | 5.912773394 imp pt/fn |
| 10 cL/h | 59.12773394 imp pt/fn |
| 60 cL/h | 354.7664037 imp pt/fn |
| 100 cL/h | 591.2773394 imp pt/fn |
| 1,000 cL/h | 5,912.773394 imp pt/fn |
Reverse conversion: Imperial pint per Fortnight to Centiliter per Hours
5.912773394 imp pt/fn × 0.169125372 = 1 cL/h
5.912773394 imperial pints per fortnight = 1 centiliter per hours.
centiliter per hours = imperial pints per fortnight × 0.169125372024
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial pint per Fortnight to Centiliter per Hours.
Understanding the Centiliter per Hours (cL/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial pint per Fortnight (imp pt/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial pints per fortnight are in 1 centiliter per hours?
1 centiliter per hours equals 5.912773394 imperial pints per fortnight, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per hours to imperial pint per fortnight?
Multiply the centiliter per hours value by 5.912773394. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial pint per fortnight back to centiliter per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial pint per fortnight equals 0.169125372 centiliter per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per hours?
Centiliter per Hours (cL/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial pint per fortnight?
Imperial pint per Fortnight (imp pt/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per hours to imperial pint per fortnight conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per hours and imperial pint per fortnight are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 5.912773394 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.