Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Hours to Metric teaspoons per Fortnight Converter — cL/h to metric tsp/fn
Convert Centiliter per Hours (cL/h) to Metric teaspoon per Fortnight (metric tsp/fn) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per hours = 672 metric teaspoon per fortnight). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Hours to Metric teaspoons per Fortnight converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.77777778e-9 / 4.13359788e-12.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Hours to Metric teaspoons per Fortnight
Centiliter per Hours and Metric teaspoon per Fortnight both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
metric teaspoons per fortnight = centiliter per hours × 672
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per hours equals 2.777778e-9 base units, and 1 metric teaspoon per fortnight equals 4.133598e-12 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per hours-to-metric teaspoon per fortnight factor of 672.
Simple example
1 cL/h × 672 = 672 metric tsp/fn
1 centiliter per hours = 672 metric teaspoons per fortnight.
Real-world example
60 cL/h × 672 = 40,320 metric tsp/fn
60 centiliter per hours = 40,320 metric teaspoons per fortnight.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Hours (cL/h) | Metric teaspoon per Fortnight (metric tsp/fn) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/h | 67.2 metric tsp/fn |
| 1 cL/h | 672 metric tsp/fn |
| 10 cL/h | 6,720 metric tsp/fn |
| 60 cL/h | 40,320 metric tsp/fn |
| 100 cL/h | 67,200 metric tsp/fn |
| 1,000 cL/h | 672,000 metric tsp/fn |
Reverse conversion: Metric teaspoon per Fortnight to Centiliter per Hours
672 metric tsp/fn × 0.001488095238 = 1 cL/h
672 metric teaspoons per fortnight = 1 centiliter per hours.
centiliter per hours = metric teaspoons per fortnight × 0.0014880952381
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Metric teaspoon per Fortnight to Centiliter per Hours.
Understanding the Centiliter per Hours (cL/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Metric teaspoon per Fortnight (metric tsp/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many metric teaspoons per fortnight are in 1 centiliter per hours?
1 centiliter per hours equals 672 metric teaspoons per fortnight, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per hours to metric teaspoon per fortnight?
Multiply the centiliter per hours value by 672. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert metric teaspoon per fortnight back to centiliter per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 metric teaspoon per fortnight equals 0.0014880952 centiliter per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per hours?
Centiliter per Hours (cL/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a metric teaspoon per fortnight?
Metric teaspoon per Fortnight (metric tsp/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per hours to metric teaspoon per fortnight conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per hours and metric teaspoon per fortnight are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 672 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.