Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliters per Millisecond to Bushel per Seconds Converter — cL/ms to bu/s
Convert Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) to Bushel per Seconds (bu/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per millisecond = 0.2837759326 bushel per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliters per Millisecond to Bushel per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.01 / 0.03523907017.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliters per Millisecond to Bushel per Seconds
Centiliter per Millisecond and Bushel per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
bushel per seconds = centiliters per millisecond × 0.283775932584
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per millisecond equals 0.01 base units, and 1 bushel per seconds equals 0.0352390701669 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per millisecond-to-bushel per seconds factor of 0.283775932584.
Simple example
1 cL/ms × 0.2837759326 = 0.2837759326 bu/s
1 centiliter per millisecond = 0.2837759326 bushel per seconds.
Real-world example
60 cL/ms × 0.2837759326 = 17.02655596 bu/s
60 centiliters per millisecond = 17.02655596 bushel per seconds.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) | Bushel per Seconds (bu/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/ms | 0.0283775933 bu/s |
| 1 cL/ms | 0.2837759326 bu/s |
| 10 cL/ms | 2.837759326 bu/s |
| 60 cL/ms | 17.02655596 bu/s |
| 100 cL/ms | 28.37759326 bu/s |
| 1,000 cL/ms | 283.7759326 bu/s |
Reverse conversion: Bushel per Seconds to Centiliter per Millisecond
0.2837759326 bu/s × 3.523907017 = 1 cL/ms
0.2837759326 bushel per seconds = 1 centiliters per millisecond.
centiliters per millisecond = bushel per seconds × 3.52390701669
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Bushel per Seconds to Centiliter per Millisecond.
Understanding the Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Bushel per Seconds (bu/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many bushel per seconds are in 1 centiliter per millisecond?
1 centiliter per millisecond equals 0.2837759326 bushel per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per millisecond to bushel per seconds?
Multiply the centiliter per millisecond value by 0.2837759326. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert bushel per seconds back to centiliter per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 bushel per seconds equals 3.523907017 centiliters per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per millisecond?
Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a bushel per seconds?
Bushel per Seconds (bu/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per millisecond to bushel per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per millisecond and bushel per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.2837759326 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.