Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliters per Millisecond to Cubic yards per Fortnight Converter — cL/ms to yd3/fn
Convert Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) to Cubic yard per Fortnight (yd3/fn) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per millisecond = 15,820.97069 cubic yard per fortnight). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliters per Millisecond to Cubic yards per Fortnight converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.01 / 6.32072469e-7.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliters per Millisecond to Cubic yards per Fortnight
Centiliter per Millisecond and Cubic yard per Fortnight both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic yards per fortnight = centiliters per millisecond × 15820.9706912
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per millisecond equals 0.01 base units, and 1 cubic yard per fortnight equals 6.320725e-7 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per millisecond-to-cubic yard per fortnight factor of 15820.9706912.
Simple example
1 cL/ms × 15820.97069 = 15,820.97069 yd3/fn
1 centiliter per millisecond = 15,820.97069 cubic yards per fortnight.
Real-world example
60 cL/ms × 15820.97069 = 949,258.2415 yd3/fn
60 centiliters per millisecond = 949,258.2415 cubic yards per fortnight.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) | Cubic yard per Fortnight (yd3/fn) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/ms | 1,582.097069 yd3/fn |
| 1 cL/ms | 15,820.97069 yd3/fn |
| 10 cL/ms | 158,209.7069 yd3/fn |
| 60 cL/ms | 949,258.2415 yd3/fn |
| 100 cL/ms | 1,582,097.069 yd3/fn |
| 1,000 cL/ms | 15,820,970.69 yd3/fn |
Reverse conversion: Cubic yard per Fortnight to Centiliter per Millisecond
1 yd3/fn × 0.00006320724686 = 0.0000632072 cL/ms
1 cubic yard per fortnight = 0.0000632072 centiliters per millisecond.
centiliters per millisecond = cubic yards per fortnight × 0.0000632072468571
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic yard per Fortnight to Centiliter per Millisecond.
Understanding the Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic yard per Fortnight (yd3/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic yards per fortnight are in 1 centiliter per millisecond?
1 centiliter per millisecond equals 15,820.97069 cubic yards per fortnight, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per millisecond to cubic yard per fortnight?
Multiply the centiliter per millisecond value by 15820.97069. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic yard per fortnight back to centiliter per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic yard per fortnight equals 0.0000632072 centiliters per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per millisecond?
Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic yard per fortnight?
Cubic yard per Fortnight (yd3/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per millisecond to cubic yard per fortnight conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per millisecond and cubic yard per fortnight are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 15820.97069 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.