Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliters per Millisecond to Cups per Millisecond Converter — cL/ms to cup/ms
Convert Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) to Cup per Millisecond (cup/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per millisecond = 0.0422675284 cup per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliters per Millisecond to Cups per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.01 / 0.2365882365.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliters per Millisecond to Cups per Millisecond
Centiliter per Millisecond and Cup per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cups per millisecond = centiliters per millisecond × 0.0422675283773
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per millisecond equals 0.01 base units, and 1 cup per millisecond equals 0.2365882365 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per millisecond-to-cup per millisecond factor of 0.0422675283773.
Simple example
1 cL/ms × 0.04226752838 = 0.0422675284 cup/ms
1 centiliter per millisecond = 0.0422675284 cups per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 cL/ms × 0.04226752838 = 2.536051703 cup/ms
60 centiliters per millisecond = 2.536051703 cups per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) | Cup per Millisecond (cup/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/ms | 0.0042267528 cup/ms |
| 1 cL/ms | 0.0422675284 cup/ms |
| 10 cL/ms | 0.4226752838 cup/ms |
| 60 cL/ms | 2.536051703 cup/ms |
| 100 cL/ms | 4.226752838 cup/ms |
| 1,000 cL/ms | 42.26752838 cup/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cup per Millisecond to Centiliter per Millisecond
0.0422675284 cup/ms × 23.65882365 = 1.000000001 cL/ms
0.0422675284 cups per millisecond = 1.000000001 centiliters per millisecond.
centiliters per millisecond = cups per millisecond × 23.65882365
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cup per Millisecond to Centiliter per Millisecond.
Understanding the Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cup per Millisecond (cup/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cups per millisecond are in 1 centiliter per millisecond?
1 centiliter per millisecond equals 0.0422675284 cups per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per millisecond to cup per millisecond?
Multiply the centiliter per millisecond value by 0.04226752838. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cup per millisecond back to centiliter per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cup per millisecond equals 23.65882365 centiliters per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per millisecond?
Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cup per millisecond?
Cup per Millisecond (cup/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per millisecond to cup per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per millisecond and cup per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.04226752838 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.