Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliters per Millisecond to Fluid ounce per Hours Converter — cL/ms to fl oz/h
Convert Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) to Fluid ounce per Hours (fl oz/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per millisecond = 1,217,304.817 fluid ounce per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliters per Millisecond to Fluid ounce per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.01 / 8.21486932e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliters per Millisecond to Fluid ounce per Hours
Centiliter per Millisecond and Fluid ounce per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
fluid ounce per hours = centiliters per millisecond × 1217304.81727
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per millisecond equals 0.01 base units, and 1 fluid ounce per hours equals 8.214869e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per millisecond-to-fluid ounce per hours factor of 1217304.81727.
Simple example
1 cL/ms × 1217304.817 = 1,217,304.817 fl oz/h
1 centiliter per millisecond = 1,217,304.817 fluid ounce per hours.
Real-world example
60 cL/ms × 1217304.817 = 73,038,289.04 fl oz/h
60 centiliters per millisecond = 73,038,289.04 fluid ounce per hours.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) | Fluid ounce per Hours (fl oz/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/ms | 121,730.4817 fl oz/h |
| 1 cL/ms | 1,217,304.817 fl oz/h |
| 10 cL/ms | 12,173,048.17 fl oz/h |
| 60 cL/ms | 73,038,289.04 fl oz/h |
| 100 cL/ms | 121,730,481.7 fl oz/h |
| 1,000 cL/ms | 1,217,304,817 fl oz/h |
Reverse conversion: Fluid ounce per Hours to Centiliter per Millisecond
1 fl oz/h × 8.214869e-7 = 8.214869e-7 cL/ms
1 fluid ounce per hours = 8.214869e-7 centiliters per millisecond.
centiliters per millisecond = fluid ounce per hours × 8.214869e-7
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Fluid ounce per Hours to Centiliter per Millisecond.
Understanding the Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Fluid ounce per Hours (fl oz/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many fluid ounce per hours are in 1 centiliter per millisecond?
1 centiliter per millisecond equals 1,217,304.817 fluid ounce per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per millisecond to fluid ounce per hours?
Multiply the centiliter per millisecond value by 1217304.817. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert fluid ounce per hours back to centiliter per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 fluid ounce per hours equals 8.214869e-7 centiliters per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per millisecond?
Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a fluid ounce per hours?
Fluid ounce per Hours (fl oz/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per millisecond to fluid ounce per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per millisecond and fluid ounce per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1217304.817 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.