Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Minutes to Fluid ounce per Weeks Converter — cL/min to fl oz/wk
Convert Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min) to Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per minutes = 3,408.453488 fluid ounce per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Minutes to Fluid ounce per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.66666667e-7 / 4.88980317e-11.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Minutes to Fluid ounce per Weeks
Centiliter per Minutes and Fluid ounce per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
fluid ounce per weeks = centiliter per minutes × 3408.45348835
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per minutes equals 1.666667e-7 base units, and 1 fluid ounce per weeks equals 4.889803e-11 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per minutes-to-fluid ounce per weeks factor of 3408.45348835.
Simple example
1 cL/min × 3408.453488 = 3,408.453488 fl oz/wk
1 centiliter per minutes = 3,408.453488 fluid ounce per weeks.
Real-world example
60 cL/min × 3408.453488 = 204,507.2093 fl oz/wk
60 centiliter per minutes = 204,507.2093 fluid ounce per weeks.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min) | Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/min | 340.8453488 fl oz/wk |
| 1 cL/min | 3,408.453488 fl oz/wk |
| 10 cL/min | 34,084.53488 fl oz/wk |
| 60 cL/min | 204,507.2093 fl oz/wk |
| 100 cL/min | 340,845.3488 fl oz/wk |
| 1,000 cL/min | 3,408,453.488 fl oz/wk |
Reverse conversion: Fluid ounce per Weeks to Centiliter per Minutes
1 fl oz/wk × 0.0002933881901 = 0.0002933882 cL/min
1 fluid ounce per weeks = 0.0002933882 centiliter per minutes.
centiliter per minutes = fluid ounce per weeks × 0.000293388190104
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Fluid ounce per Weeks to Centiliter per Minutes.
Understanding the Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many fluid ounce per weeks are in 1 centiliter per minutes?
1 centiliter per minutes equals 3,408.453488 fluid ounce per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per minutes to fluid ounce per weeks?
Multiply the centiliter per minutes value by 3408.453488. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert fluid ounce per weeks back to centiliter per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 fluid ounce per weeks equals 0.0002933882 centiliter per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per minutes?
Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a fluid ounce per weeks?
Fluid ounce per Weeks (fl oz/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per minutes to fluid ounce per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per minutes and fluid ounce per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 3408.453488 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.