Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Minutes to Imperial quart per Hours Converter — cL/min to imp qt/h
Convert Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min) to Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per minutes = 0.5279261959 imperial quart per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Minutes to Imperial quart per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.66666667e-7 / 3.15700694e-7.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Minutes to Imperial quart per Hours
Centiliter per Minutes and Imperial quart per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per hours = centiliter per minutes × 0.527926195918
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per minutes equals 1.666667e-7 base units, and 1 imperial quart per hours equals 3.157007e-7 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per minutes-to-imperial quart per hours factor of 0.527926195918.
Simple example
1 cL/min × 0.5279261959 = 0.5279261959 imp qt/h
1 centiliter per minutes = 0.5279261959 imperial quart per hours.
Real-world example
60 cL/min × 0.5279261959 = 31.67557176 imp qt/h
60 centiliter per minutes = 31.67557176 imperial quart per hours.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min) | Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/min | 0.0527926196 imp qt/h |
| 1 cL/min | 0.5279261959 imp qt/h |
| 10 cL/min | 5.279261959 imp qt/h |
| 60 cL/min | 31.67557176 imp qt/h |
| 100 cL/min | 52.79261959 imp qt/h |
| 1,000 cL/min | 527.9261959 imp qt/h |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Hours to Centiliter per Minutes
0.5279261959 imp qt/h × 1.894204167 = 1 cL/min
0.5279261959 imperial quart per hours = 1 centiliter per minutes.
centiliter per minutes = imperial quart per hours × 1.89420416667
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Hours to Centiliter per Minutes.
Understanding the Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per hours are in 1 centiliter per minutes?
1 centiliter per minutes equals 0.5279261959 imperial quart per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per minutes to imperial quart per hours?
Multiply the centiliter per minutes value by 0.5279261959. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per hours back to centiliter per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per hours equals 1.894204167 centiliter per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per minutes?
Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per hours?
Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per minutes to imperial quart per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per minutes and imperial quart per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.5279261959 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.