Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Minutes to Imperial quart per Weeks Converter — cL/min to imp qt/wk
Convert Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min) to Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per minutes = 88.69160091 imperial quart per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Minutes to Imperial quart per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.66666667e-7 / 1.8791708e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Minutes to Imperial quart per Weeks
Centiliter per Minutes and Imperial quart per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per weeks = centiliter per minutes × 88.6916009142
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per minutes equals 1.666667e-7 base units, and 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 1.879171e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per minutes-to-imperial quart per weeks factor of 88.6916009142.
Simple example
1 cL/min × 88.69160091 = 88.69160091 imp qt/wk
1 centiliter per minutes = 88.69160091 imperial quart per weeks.
Real-world example
60 cL/min × 88.69160091 = 5,321.496055 imp qt/wk
60 centiliter per minutes = 5,321.496055 imperial quart per weeks.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min) | Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/min | 8.869160091 imp qt/wk |
| 1 cL/min | 88.69160091 imp qt/wk |
| 10 cL/min | 886.9160091 imp qt/wk |
| 60 cL/min | 5,321.496055 imp qt/wk |
| 100 cL/min | 8,869.160091 imp qt/wk |
| 1,000 cL/min | 88,691.60091 imp qt/wk |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Weeks to Centiliter per Minutes
88.69160091 imp qt/wk × 0.0112750248 = 1 cL/min
88.69160091 imperial quart per weeks = 1 centiliter per minutes.
centiliter per minutes = imperial quart per weeks × 0.0112750248016
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Weeks to Centiliter per Minutes.
Understanding the Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per weeks are in 1 centiliter per minutes?
1 centiliter per minutes equals 88.69160091 imperial quart per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per minutes to imperial quart per weeks?
Multiply the centiliter per minutes value by 88.69160091. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per weeks back to centiliter per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 0.0112750248 centiliter per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per minutes?
Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per weeks?
Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per minutes to imperial quart per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per minutes and imperial quart per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 88.69160091 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.