Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Minutes to Metric teaspoon per Weeks Converter — cL/min to metric tsp/wk
Convert Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min) to Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per minutes = 20,160 metric teaspoon per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Minutes to Metric teaspoon per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.66666667e-7 / 8.26719577e-12.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Minutes to Metric teaspoon per Weeks
Centiliter per Minutes and Metric teaspoon per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
metric teaspoon per weeks = centiliter per minutes × 20160
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per minutes equals 1.666667e-7 base units, and 1 metric teaspoon per weeks equals 8.267196e-12 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per minutes-to-metric teaspoon per weeks factor of 20160.
Simple example
1 cL/min × 20160 = 20,160 metric tsp/wk
1 centiliter per minutes = 20,160 metric teaspoon per weeks.
Real-world example
60 cL/min × 20160 = 1,209,600 metric tsp/wk
60 centiliter per minutes = 1,209,600 metric teaspoon per weeks.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min) | Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/min | 2,016 metric tsp/wk |
| 1 cL/min | 20,160 metric tsp/wk |
| 10 cL/min | 201,600 metric tsp/wk |
| 60 cL/min | 1,209,600 metric tsp/wk |
| 100 cL/min | 2,016,000 metric tsp/wk |
| 1,000 cL/min | 20,160,000 metric tsp/wk |
Reverse conversion: Metric teaspoon per Weeks to Centiliter per Minutes
1 metric tsp/wk × 0.0000496031746 = 0.0000496032 cL/min
1 metric teaspoon per weeks = 0.0000496032 centiliter per minutes.
centiliter per minutes = metric teaspoon per weeks × 0.0000496031746032
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Metric teaspoon per Weeks to Centiliter per Minutes.
Understanding the Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many metric teaspoon per weeks are in 1 centiliter per minutes?
1 centiliter per minutes equals 20,160 metric teaspoon per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per minutes to metric teaspoon per weeks?
Multiply the centiliter per minutes value by 20160. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert metric teaspoon per weeks back to centiliter per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 metric teaspoon per weeks equals 0.0000496032 centiliter per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per minutes?
Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a metric teaspoon per weeks?
Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per minutes to metric teaspoon per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per minutes and metric teaspoon per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 20160 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.