Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Seconds to Bushels per Millisecond Converter — cL/s to bu/ms
Convert Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) to Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per seconds = 2.837759e-7 bushel per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Seconds to Bushels per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1e-5 / 35.23907017.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Seconds to Bushels per Millisecond
Centiliter per Seconds and Bushel per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
bushels per millisecond = centiliter per seconds × 2.837759e-7
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per seconds equals 0.00001 base units, and 1 bushel per millisecond equals 35.2390701669 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per seconds-to-bushel per millisecond factor of 2.837759e-7.
Simple example
1 cL/s × 2.837759e-7 = 2.837759e-7 bu/ms
1 centiliter per seconds = 2.837759e-7 bushels per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 cL/s × 2.837759e-7 = 0.0000170266 bu/ms
60 centiliter per seconds = 0.0000170266 bushels per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) | Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/s | 2.837759e-8 bu/ms |
| 1 cL/s | 2.837759e-7 bu/ms |
| 10 cL/s | 0.0000028378 bu/ms |
| 60 cL/s | 0.0000170266 bu/ms |
| 100 cL/s | 0.0000283776 bu/ms |
| 1,000 cL/s | 0.0002837759 bu/ms |
Reverse conversion: Bushel per Millisecond to Centiliter per Seconds
2.837759e-7 bu/ms × 3523907.017 = 0.9999998852 cL/s
2.837759e-7 bushels per millisecond = 0.9999998852 centiliter per seconds.
centiliter per seconds = bushels per millisecond × 3523907.01669
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Bushel per Millisecond to Centiliter per Seconds.
Understanding the Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many bushels per millisecond are in 1 centiliter per seconds?
1 centiliter per seconds equals 2.837759e-7 bushels per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per seconds to bushel per millisecond?
Multiply the centiliter per seconds value by 2.837759e-7. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert bushel per millisecond back to centiliter per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 bushel per millisecond equals 3,523,907.017 centiliter per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per seconds?
Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a bushel per millisecond?
Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per seconds to bushel per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per seconds and bushel per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 2.837759e-7 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.