Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Seconds to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks Converter — cL/s to cm3/wk
Convert Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per seconds = 6,048,000 cubic centimeter per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Seconds to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1e-5 / 1.65343915e-12.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Seconds to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks
Centiliter per Seconds and Cubic Centimeter per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeter per weeks = centiliter per seconds × 6048000
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per seconds equals 0.00001 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per seconds-to-cubic centimeter per weeks factor of 6048000.
Simple example
1 cL/s × 6048000 = 6,048,000 cm3/wk
1 centiliter per seconds = 6,048,000 cubic centimeter per weeks.
Real-world example
60 cL/s × 6048000 = 362,880,000 cm3/wk
60 centiliter per seconds = 362,880,000 cubic centimeter per weeks.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) | Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/s | 604,800 cm3/wk |
| 1 cL/s | 6,048,000 cm3/wk |
| 10 cL/s | 60,480,000 cm3/wk |
| 60 cL/s | 362,880,000 cm3/wk |
| 100 cL/s | 604,800,000 cm3/wk |
| 1,000 cL/s | 6,048,000,000 cm3/wk |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Centiliter per Seconds
1 cm3/wk × 1.653439e-7 = 1.653439e-7 cL/s
1 cubic centimeter per weeks = 1.653439e-7 centiliter per seconds.
centiliter per seconds = cubic centimeter per weeks × 1.653439e-7
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Centiliter per Seconds.
Understanding the Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeter per weeks are in 1 centiliter per seconds?
1 centiliter per seconds equals 6,048,000 cubic centimeter per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per seconds to cubic centimeter per weeks?
Multiply the centiliter per seconds value by 6048000. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per weeks back to centiliter per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-7 centiliter per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per seconds?
Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per weeks?
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per seconds to cubic centimeter per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per seconds and cubic centimeter per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 6048000 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.