Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Seconds to Cubic feet per Fortnight Converter — cL/s to ft3/fn
Convert Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) to Cubic foot per Fortnight (ft3/fn) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per seconds = 427.1662087 cubic foot per fortnight). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Seconds to Cubic feet per Fortnight converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1e-5 / 2.34100914e-8.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Seconds to Cubic feet per Fortnight
Centiliter per Seconds and Cubic foot per Fortnight both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic feet per fortnight = centiliter per seconds × 427.166208663
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per seconds equals 0.00001 base units, and 1 cubic foot per fortnight equals 2.341009e-8 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per seconds-to-cubic foot per fortnight factor of 427.166208663.
Simple example
1 cL/s × 427.1662087 = 427.1662087 ft3/fn
1 centiliter per seconds = 427.1662087 cubic feet per fortnight.
Real-world example
60 cL/s × 427.1662087 = 25,629.97252 ft3/fn
60 centiliter per seconds = 25,629.97252 cubic feet per fortnight.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) | Cubic foot per Fortnight (ft3/fn) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/s | 42.71662087 ft3/fn |
| 1 cL/s | 427.1662087 ft3/fn |
| 10 cL/s | 4,271.662087 ft3/fn |
| 60 cL/s | 25,629.97252 ft3/fn |
| 100 cL/s | 42,716.62087 ft3/fn |
| 1,000 cL/s | 427,166.2087 ft3/fn |
Reverse conversion: Cubic foot per Fortnight to Centiliter per Seconds
427.1662087 ft3/fn × 0.002341009143 = 1 cL/s
427.1662087 cubic feet per fortnight = 1 centiliter per seconds.
centiliter per seconds = cubic feet per fortnight × 0.00234100914286
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic foot per Fortnight to Centiliter per Seconds.
Understanding the Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Fortnight (ft3/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic feet per fortnight are in 1 centiliter per seconds?
1 centiliter per seconds equals 427.1662087 cubic feet per fortnight, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per seconds to cubic foot per fortnight?
Multiply the centiliter per seconds value by 427.1662087. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic foot per fortnight back to centiliter per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic foot per fortnight equals 0.0023410091 centiliter per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per seconds?
Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic foot per fortnight?
Cubic foot per Fortnight (ft3/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per seconds to cubic foot per fortnight conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per seconds and cubic foot per fortnight are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 427.1662087 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.