Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Seconds to Cubic Millimeters per Fortnight Converter — cL/s to mm3/fn
Convert Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) to Cubic Millimeter per Fortnight (mm3/fn) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per seconds = 12,096,000,000 cubic millimeter per fortnight). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Seconds to Cubic Millimeters per Fortnight converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1e-5 / 8.26719577e-16.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Seconds to Cubic Millimeters per Fortnight
Centiliter per Seconds and Cubic Millimeter per Fortnight both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeters per fortnight = centiliter per seconds × 12096000000
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per seconds equals 0.00001 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-16 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per seconds-to-cubic millimeter per fortnight factor of 12096000000.
Simple example
1 cL/s × 12096000000 = 12,096,000,000 mm3/fn
1 centiliter per seconds = 12,096,000,000 cubic millimeters per fortnight.
Real-world example
60 cL/s × 12096000000 = 725,760,000,000 mm3/fn
60 centiliter per seconds = 725,760,000,000 cubic millimeters per fortnight.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) | Cubic Millimeter per Fortnight (mm3/fn) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/s | 1,209,600,000 mm3/fn |
| 1 cL/s | 12,096,000,000 mm3/fn |
| 10 cL/s | 120,960,000,000 mm3/fn |
| 60 cL/s | 725,760,000,000 mm3/fn |
| 100 cL/s | 1.2096e+12 mm3/fn |
| 1,000 cL/s | 1.2096e+13 mm3/fn |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Fortnight to Centiliter per Seconds
1 mm3/fn × 8.267196e-11 = 8.267196e-11 cL/s
1 cubic millimeter per fortnight = 8.267196e-11 centiliter per seconds.
centiliter per seconds = cubic millimeters per fortnight × 8.267196e-11
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Fortnight to Centiliter per Seconds.
Understanding the Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Fortnight (mm3/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeters per fortnight are in 1 centiliter per seconds?
1 centiliter per seconds equals 12,096,000,000 cubic millimeters per fortnight, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per seconds to cubic millimeter per fortnight?
Multiply the centiliter per seconds value by 12096000000. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per fortnight back to centiliter per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-11 centiliter per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per seconds?
Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per fortnight?
Cubic Millimeter per Fortnight (mm3/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per seconds to cubic millimeter per fortnight conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per seconds and cubic millimeter per fortnight are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 12096000000 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.