Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Seconds to Imperial pint per Hours Converter — cL/s to imp pt/h
Convert Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) to Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per seconds = 63.35114351 imperial pint per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Seconds to Imperial pint per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1e-5 / 1.57850347e-7.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Seconds to Imperial pint per Hours
Centiliter per Seconds and Imperial pint per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial pint per hours = centiliter per seconds × 63.3511435101
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per seconds equals 0.00001 base units, and 1 imperial pint per hours equals 1.578503e-7 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per seconds-to-imperial pint per hours factor of 63.3511435101.
Simple example
1 cL/s × 63.35114351 = 63.35114351 imp pt/h
1 centiliter per seconds = 63.35114351 imperial pint per hours.
Real-world example
60 cL/s × 63.35114351 = 3,801.068611 imp pt/h
60 centiliter per seconds = 3,801.068611 imperial pint per hours.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) | Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/s | 6.335114351 imp pt/h |
| 1 cL/s | 63.35114351 imp pt/h |
| 10 cL/s | 633.5114351 imp pt/h |
| 60 cL/s | 3,801.068611 imp pt/h |
| 100 cL/s | 6,335.114351 imp pt/h |
| 1,000 cL/s | 63,351.14351 imp pt/h |
Reverse conversion: Imperial pint per Hours to Centiliter per Seconds
63.35114351 imp pt/h × 0.01578503472 = 1 cL/s
63.35114351 imperial pint per hours = 1 centiliter per seconds.
centiliter per seconds = imperial pint per hours × 0.0157850347222
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial pint per Hours to Centiliter per Seconds.
Understanding the Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial pint per hours are in 1 centiliter per seconds?
1 centiliter per seconds equals 63.35114351 imperial pint per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per seconds to imperial pint per hours?
Multiply the centiliter per seconds value by 63.35114351. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial pint per hours back to centiliter per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial pint per hours equals 0.0157850347 centiliter per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per seconds?
Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial pint per hours?
Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per seconds to imperial pint per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per seconds and imperial pint per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 63.35114351 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.