Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Seconds to Imperial quarts per Fortnight Converter — cL/s to imp qt/fn
Convert Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) to Imperial quart per Fortnight (imp qt/fn) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per seconds = 10,642.99211 imperial quart per fortnight). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Seconds to Imperial quarts per Fortnight converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1e-5 / 9.395854e-10.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Seconds to Imperial quarts per Fortnight
Centiliter per Seconds and Imperial quart per Fortnight both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quarts per fortnight = centiliter per seconds × 10642.9921097
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per seconds equals 0.00001 base units, and 1 imperial quart per fortnight equals 9.395854e-10 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per seconds-to-imperial quart per fortnight factor of 10642.9921097.
Simple example
1 cL/s × 10642.99211 = 10,642.99211 imp qt/fn
1 centiliter per seconds = 10,642.99211 imperial quarts per fortnight.
Real-world example
60 cL/s × 10642.99211 = 638,579.5266 imp qt/fn
60 centiliter per seconds = 638,579.5266 imperial quarts per fortnight.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) | Imperial quart per Fortnight (imp qt/fn) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/s | 1,064.299211 imp qt/fn |
| 1 cL/s | 10,642.99211 imp qt/fn |
| 10 cL/s | 106,429.9211 imp qt/fn |
| 60 cL/s | 638,579.5266 imp qt/fn |
| 100 cL/s | 1,064,299.211 imp qt/fn |
| 1,000 cL/s | 10,642,992.11 imp qt/fn |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Fortnight to Centiliter per Seconds
1 imp qt/fn × 0.00009395854001 = 0.0000939585 cL/s
1 imperial quart per fortnight = 0.0000939585 centiliter per seconds.
centiliter per seconds = imperial quarts per fortnight × 0.0000939585400132
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Fortnight to Centiliter per Seconds.
Understanding the Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Fortnight (imp qt/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quarts per fortnight are in 1 centiliter per seconds?
1 centiliter per seconds equals 10,642.99211 imperial quarts per fortnight, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per seconds to imperial quart per fortnight?
Multiply the centiliter per seconds value by 10642.99211. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per fortnight back to centiliter per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per fortnight equals 0.0000939585 centiliter per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per seconds?
Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per fortnight?
Imperial quart per Fortnight (imp qt/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per seconds to imperial quart per fortnight conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per seconds and imperial quart per fortnight are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 10642.99211 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.