Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Seconds to Imperial quart per Hours Converter — cL/s to imp qt/h
Convert Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) to Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per seconds = 31.67557176 imperial quart per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Seconds to Imperial quart per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1e-5 / 3.15700694e-7.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Seconds to Imperial quart per Hours
Centiliter per Seconds and Imperial quart per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per hours = centiliter per seconds × 31.6755717551
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per seconds equals 0.00001 base units, and 1 imperial quart per hours equals 3.157007e-7 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per seconds-to-imperial quart per hours factor of 31.6755717551.
Simple example
1 cL/s × 31.67557176 = 31.67557176 imp qt/h
1 centiliter per seconds = 31.67557176 imperial quart per hours.
Real-world example
60 cL/s × 31.67557176 = 1,900.534305 imp qt/h
60 centiliter per seconds = 1,900.534305 imperial quart per hours.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) | Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/s | 3.167557176 imp qt/h |
| 1 cL/s | 31.67557176 imp qt/h |
| 10 cL/s | 316.7557176 imp qt/h |
| 60 cL/s | 1,900.534305 imp qt/h |
| 100 cL/s | 3,167.557176 imp qt/h |
| 1,000 cL/s | 31,675.57176 imp qt/h |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Hours to Centiliter per Seconds
31.67557176 imp qt/h × 0.03157006944 = 1 cL/s
31.67557176 imperial quart per hours = 1 centiliter per seconds.
centiliter per seconds = imperial quart per hours × 0.0315700694444
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Hours to Centiliter per Seconds.
Understanding the Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per hours are in 1 centiliter per seconds?
1 centiliter per seconds equals 31.67557176 imperial quart per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per seconds to imperial quart per hours?
Multiply the centiliter per seconds value by 31.67557176. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per hours back to centiliter per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per hours equals 0.0315700694 centiliter per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per seconds?
Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per hours?
Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per seconds to imperial quart per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per seconds and imperial quart per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 31.67557176 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.