Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Minutes Converter — cL/wk to cm3/min
Convert Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) to Cubic Centimeter per Minutes (cm3/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per weeks = 0.0009920635 cubic centimeter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-11 / 1.66666667e-8.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Minutes
Centiliter per Weeks and Cubic Centimeter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeter per minutes = centiliter per weeks × 0.000992063492063
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-11 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per minutes equals 1.666667e-8 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per weeks-to-cubic centimeter per minutes factor of 0.000992063492063.
Simple example
1 cL/wk × 0.0009920634921 = 0.0009920635 cm3/min
1 centiliter per weeks = 0.0009920635 cubic centimeter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 cL/wk × 0.0009920634921 = 0.0595238095 cm3/min
60 centiliter per weeks = 0.0595238095 cubic centimeter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) | Cubic Centimeter per Minutes (cm3/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/wk | 0.0000992063 cm3/min |
| 1 cL/wk | 0.0009920635 cm3/min |
| 10 cL/wk | 0.0099206349 cm3/min |
| 60 cL/wk | 0.0595238095 cm3/min |
| 100 cL/wk | 0.0992063492 cm3/min |
| 1,000 cL/wk | 0.9920634921 cm3/min |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Minutes to Centiliter per Weeks
0.0009920635 cm3/min × 1008 = 1.000000008 cL/wk
0.0009920635 cubic centimeter per minutes = 1.000000008 centiliter per weeks.
centiliter per weeks = cubic centimeter per minutes × 1008
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Minutes to Centiliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Minutes (cm3/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeter per minutes are in 1 centiliter per weeks?
1 centiliter per weeks equals 0.0009920635 cubic centimeter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per weeks to cubic centimeter per minutes?
Multiply the centiliter per weeks value by 0.0009920634921. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per minutes back to centiliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per minutes equals 1,008 centiliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per weeks?
Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per minutes?
Cubic Centimeter per Minutes (cm3/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per weeks to cubic centimeter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per weeks and cubic centimeter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0009920634921 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.