Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Weeks to Cubic feet per Millisecond Converter — cL/wk to ft3/ms
Convert Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) to Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per weeks = 5.839065e-13 cubic foot per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Weeks to Cubic feet per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-11 / 28.31684659.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Weeks to Cubic feet per Millisecond
Centiliter per Weeks and Cubic foot per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic feet per millisecond = centiliter per weeks × 5.839065e-13
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-11 base units, and 1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 28.316846592 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per weeks-to-cubic foot per millisecond factor of 5.839065e-13.
Simple example
1 cL/wk × 5.839065e-13 = 5.839065e-13 ft3/ms
1 centiliter per weeks = 5.839065e-13 cubic feet per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 cL/wk × 5.839065e-13 = 3.503439e-11 ft3/ms
60 centiliter per weeks = 3.503439e-11 cubic feet per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) | Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/wk | 5.839065e-14 ft3/ms |
| 1 cL/wk | 5.839065e-13 ft3/ms |
| 10 cL/wk | 5.839065e-12 ft3/ms |
| 60 cL/wk | 3.503439e-11 ft3/ms |
| 100 cL/wk | 5.839065e-11 ft3/ms |
| 1,000 cL/wk | 5.839065e-10 ft3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic foot per Millisecond to Centiliter per Weeks
5.839065e-13 ft3/ms × 1.712603e+12 = 0.9999999547 cL/wk
5.839065e-13 cubic feet per millisecond = 0.9999999547 centiliter per weeks.
centiliter per weeks = cubic feet per millisecond × 1.712603e+12
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic foot per Millisecond to Centiliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic feet per millisecond are in 1 centiliter per weeks?
1 centiliter per weeks equals 5.839065e-13 cubic feet per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per weeks to cubic foot per millisecond?
Multiply the centiliter per weeks value by 5.839065e-13. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic foot per millisecond back to centiliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 1.712603e+12 centiliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per weeks?
Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic foot per millisecond?
Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per weeks to cubic foot per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per weeks and cubic foot per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 5.839065e-13 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.