Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Weeks to Cubic inch per Seconds Converter — cL/wk to in3/s
Convert Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) to Cubic inch per Seconds (in3/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per weeks = 0.000001009 cubic inch per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Weeks to Cubic inch per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-11 / 1.6387064e-5.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Weeks to Cubic inch per Seconds
Centiliter per Weeks and Cubic inch per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic inch per seconds = centiliter per weeks × 0.00000100899047776
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-11 base units, and 1 cubic inch per seconds equals 0.000016387064 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per weeks-to-cubic inch per seconds factor of 0.00000100899047776.
Simple example
1 cL/wk × 0.000001008990478 = 0.000001009 in3/s
1 centiliter per weeks = 0.000001009 cubic inch per seconds.
Real-world example
60 cL/wk × 0.000001008990478 = 0.0000605394 in3/s
60 centiliter per weeks = 0.0000605394 cubic inch per seconds.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) | Cubic inch per Seconds (in3/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/wk | 1.00899e-7 in3/s |
| 1 cL/wk | 0.000001009 in3/s |
| 10 cL/wk | 0.0000100899 in3/s |
| 60 cL/wk | 0.0000605394 in3/s |
| 100 cL/wk | 0.000100899 in3/s |
| 1,000 cL/wk | 0.0010089905 in3/s |
Reverse conversion: Cubic inch per Seconds to Centiliter per Weeks
0.000001009 in3/s × 991089.6307 = 1.000009437 cL/wk
0.000001009 cubic inch per seconds = 1.000009437 centiliter per weeks.
centiliter per weeks = cubic inch per seconds × 991089.63072
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic inch per Seconds to Centiliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic inch per Seconds (in3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic inch per seconds are in 1 centiliter per weeks?
1 centiliter per weeks equals 0.000001009 cubic inch per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per weeks to cubic inch per seconds?
Multiply the centiliter per weeks value by 0.000001008990478. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic inch per seconds back to centiliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic inch per seconds equals 991,089.6307 centiliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per weeks?
Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic inch per seconds?
Cubic inch per Seconds (in3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per weeks to cubic inch per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per weeks and cubic inch per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000001008990478 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.