Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Hours Converter — cL/wk to mm3/h
Convert Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) to Cubic Millimeter per Hours (mm3/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per weeks = 59.52380952 cubic millimeter per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-11 / 2.77777778e-13.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Hours
Centiliter per Weeks and Cubic Millimeter per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per hours = centiliter per weeks × 59.5238095238
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-11 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per hours equals 2.777778e-13 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per weeks-to-cubic millimeter per hours factor of 59.5238095238.
Simple example
1 cL/wk × 59.52380952 = 59.52380952 mm3/h
1 centiliter per weeks = 59.52380952 cubic millimeter per hours.
Real-world example
60 cL/wk × 59.52380952 = 3,571.428571 mm3/h
60 centiliter per weeks = 3,571.428571 cubic millimeter per hours.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) | Cubic Millimeter per Hours (mm3/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/wk | 5.952380952 mm3/h |
| 1 cL/wk | 59.52380952 mm3/h |
| 10 cL/wk | 595.2380952 mm3/h |
| 60 cL/wk | 3,571.428571 mm3/h |
| 100 cL/wk | 5,952.380952 mm3/h |
| 1,000 cL/wk | 59,523.80952 mm3/h |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Hours to Centiliter per Weeks
59.52380952 mm3/h × 0.0168 = 0.9999999999 cL/wk
59.52380952 cubic millimeter per hours = 0.9999999999 centiliter per weeks.
centiliter per weeks = cubic millimeter per hours × 0.0168
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Hours to Centiliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Hours (mm3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per hours are in 1 centiliter per weeks?
1 centiliter per weeks equals 59.52380952 cubic millimeter per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per weeks to cubic millimeter per hours?
Multiply the centiliter per weeks value by 59.52380952. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per hours back to centiliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per hours equals 0.0168 centiliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per weeks?
Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per hours?
Cubic Millimeter per Hours (mm3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per weeks to cubic millimeter per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per weeks and cubic millimeter per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 59.52380952 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.