Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes Converter — cL/wk to mm3/min
Convert Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per weeks = 0.9920634921 cubic millimeter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-11 / 1.66666667e-11.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes
Centiliter per Weeks and Cubic Millimeter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per minutes = centiliter per weeks × 0.992063492063
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-11 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 1.666667e-11 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per weeks-to-cubic millimeter per minutes factor of 0.992063492063.
Simple example
1 cL/wk × 0.9920634921 = 0.9920634921 mm3/min
1 centiliter per weeks = 0.9920634921 cubic millimeter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 cL/wk × 0.9920634921 = 59.52380952 mm3/min
60 centiliter per weeks = 59.52380952 cubic millimeter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) | Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/wk | 0.0992063492 mm3/min |
| 1 cL/wk | 0.9920634921 mm3/min |
| 10 cL/wk | 9.920634921 mm3/min |
| 60 cL/wk | 59.52380952 mm3/min |
| 100 cL/wk | 99.20634921 mm3/min |
| 1,000 cL/wk | 992.0634921 mm3/min |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Centiliter per Weeks
0.9920634921 mm3/min × 1.008 = 1 cL/wk
0.9920634921 cubic millimeter per minutes = 1 centiliter per weeks.
centiliter per weeks = cubic millimeter per minutes × 1.008
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Centiliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per minutes are in 1 centiliter per weeks?
1 centiliter per weeks equals 0.9920634921 cubic millimeter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per weeks to cubic millimeter per minutes?
Multiply the centiliter per weeks value by 0.9920634921. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per minutes back to centiliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 1.008 centiliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per weeks?
Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per minutes?
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per weeks to cubic millimeter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per weeks and cubic millimeter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.9920634921 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.