Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds Converter — cL/wk to mm3/s
Convert Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per weeks = 0.0165343915 cubic millimeter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-11 / 1e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds
Centiliter per Weeks and Cubic Millimeter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per seconds = centiliter per weeks × 0.0165343915344
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-11 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 1e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per weeks-to-cubic millimeter per seconds factor of 0.0165343915344.
Simple example
1 cL/wk × 0.01653439153 = 0.0165343915 mm3/s
1 centiliter per weeks = 0.0165343915 cubic millimeter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 cL/wk × 0.01653439153 = 0.9920634921 mm3/s
60 centiliter per weeks = 0.9920634921 cubic millimeter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) | Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/wk | 0.0016534392 mm3/s |
| 1 cL/wk | 0.0165343915 mm3/s |
| 10 cL/wk | 0.1653439153 mm3/s |
| 60 cL/wk | 0.9920634921 mm3/s |
| 100 cL/wk | 1.653439153 mm3/s |
| 1,000 cL/wk | 16.53439153 mm3/s |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Centiliter per Weeks
0.0165343915 mm3/s × 60.48 = 0.9999999979 cL/wk
0.0165343915 cubic millimeter per seconds = 0.9999999979 centiliter per weeks.
centiliter per weeks = cubic millimeter per seconds × 60.48
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Centiliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per seconds are in 1 centiliter per weeks?
1 centiliter per weeks equals 0.0165343915 cubic millimeter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per weeks to cubic millimeter per seconds?
Multiply the centiliter per weeks value by 0.01653439153. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per seconds back to centiliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 60.48 centiliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per weeks?
Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per seconds?
Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per weeks to cubic millimeter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per weeks and cubic millimeter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.01653439153 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.