Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Weeks to Metric cup per Minutes Converter — cL/wk to metric cup/min
Convert Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) to Metric cup per Minutes (metric cup/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per weeks = 0.0000039683 metric cup per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Weeks to Metric cup per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-11 / 4.16666667e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Weeks to Metric cup per Minutes
Centiliter per Weeks and Metric cup per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
metric cup per minutes = centiliter per weeks × 0.00000396825396825
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-11 base units, and 1 metric cup per minutes equals 0.00000416666666667 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per weeks-to-metric cup per minutes factor of 0.00000396825396825.
Simple example
1 cL/wk × 0.000003968253968 = 0.0000039683 metric cup/min
1 centiliter per weeks = 0.0000039683 metric cup per minutes.
Real-world example
60 cL/wk × 0.000003968253968 = 0.0002380952 metric cup/min
60 centiliter per weeks = 0.0002380952 metric cup per minutes.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) | Metric cup per Minutes (metric cup/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/wk | 3.968254e-7 metric cup/min |
| 1 cL/wk | 0.0000039683 metric cup/min |
| 10 cL/wk | 0.0000396825 metric cup/min |
| 60 cL/wk | 0.0002380952 metric cup/min |
| 100 cL/wk | 0.0003968254 metric cup/min |
| 1,000 cL/wk | 0.003968254 metric cup/min |
Reverse conversion: Metric cup per Minutes to Centiliter per Weeks
0.0000039683 metric cup/min × 252000 = 1.0000116 cL/wk
0.0000039683 metric cup per minutes = 1.0000116 centiliter per weeks.
centiliter per weeks = metric cup per minutes × 252000
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Metric cup per Minutes to Centiliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Metric cup per Minutes (metric cup/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many metric cup per minutes are in 1 centiliter per weeks?
1 centiliter per weeks equals 0.0000039683 metric cup per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per weeks to metric cup per minutes?
Multiply the centiliter per weeks value by 0.000003968253968. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert metric cup per minutes back to centiliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 metric cup per minutes equals 252,000 centiliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per weeks?
Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a metric cup per minutes?
Metric cup per Minutes (metric cup/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per weeks to metric cup per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per weeks and metric cup per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000003968253968 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.