Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Weeks to Fluid ounce per Minutes Converter — cL/wk to fl oz/min
Convert Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) to Fluid ounce per Minutes (fl oz/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per weeks = 0.0000335457 fluid ounce per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Weeks to Fluid ounce per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-11 / 4.92892159e-7.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Weeks to Fluid ounce per Minutes
Centiliter per Weeks and Fluid ounce per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
fluid ounce per minutes = centiliter per weeks × 0.0000335456574423
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-11 base units, and 1 fluid ounce per minutes equals 4.928922e-7 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per weeks-to-fluid ounce per minutes factor of 0.0000335456574423.
Simple example
1 cL/wk × 0.00003354565744 = 0.0000335457 fl oz/min
1 centiliter per weeks = 0.0000335457 fluid ounce per minutes.
Real-world example
60 cL/wk × 0.00003354565744 = 0.0020127394 fl oz/min
60 centiliter per weeks = 0.0020127394 fluid ounce per minutes.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) | Fluid ounce per Minutes (fl oz/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/wk | 0.0000033546 fl oz/min |
| 1 cL/wk | 0.0000335457 fl oz/min |
| 10 cL/wk | 0.0003354566 fl oz/min |
| 60 cL/wk | 0.0020127394 fl oz/min |
| 100 cL/wk | 0.0033545657 fl oz/min |
| 1,000 cL/wk | 0.0335456574 fl oz/min |
Reverse conversion: Fluid ounce per Minutes to Centiliter per Weeks
0.0000335457 fl oz/min × 29810.1178 = 1.000001269 cL/wk
0.0000335457 fluid ounce per minutes = 1.000001269 centiliter per weeks.
centiliter per weeks = fluid ounce per minutes × 29810.117799
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Fluid ounce per Minutes to Centiliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Fluid ounce per Minutes (fl oz/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many fluid ounce per minutes are in 1 centiliter per weeks?
1 centiliter per weeks equals 0.0000335457 fluid ounce per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per weeks to fluid ounce per minutes?
Multiply the centiliter per weeks value by 0.00003354565744. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert fluid ounce per minutes back to centiliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 fluid ounce per minutes equals 29,810.1178 centiliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per weeks?
Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a fluid ounce per minutes?
Fluid ounce per Minutes (fl oz/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per weeks to fluid ounce per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per weeks and fluid ounce per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00003354565744 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.