Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Weeks to Imperial gallon per Seconds Converter — cL/wk to imp gal/s
Convert Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) to Imperial gallon per Seconds (imp gal/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per weeks = 3.637058e-9 imperial gallon per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Weeks to Imperial gallon per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-11 / 0.00454609.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Weeks to Imperial gallon per Seconds
Centiliter per Weeks and Imperial gallon per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial gallon per seconds = centiliter per weeks × 3.637058e-9
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-11 base units, and 1 imperial gallon per seconds equals 0.00454609 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per weeks-to-imperial gallon per seconds factor of 3.637058e-9.
Simple example
1 cL/wk × 3.637058e-9 = 3.637058e-9 imp gal/s
1 centiliter per weeks = 3.637058e-9 imperial gallon per seconds.
Real-world example
60 cL/wk × 3.637058e-9 = 2.182235e-7 imp gal/s
60 centiliter per weeks = 2.182235e-7 imperial gallon per seconds.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) | Imperial gallon per Seconds (imp gal/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/wk | 3.637058e-10 imp gal/s |
| 1 cL/wk | 3.637058e-9 imp gal/s |
| 10 cL/wk | 3.637058e-8 imp gal/s |
| 60 cL/wk | 2.182235e-7 imp gal/s |
| 100 cL/wk | 3.637058e-7 imp gal/s |
| 1,000 cL/wk | 0.0000036371 imp gal/s |
Reverse conversion: Imperial gallon per Seconds to Centiliter per Weeks
3.637058e-9 imp gal/s × 274947523.2 = 1.000000089 cL/wk
3.637058e-9 imperial gallon per seconds = 1.000000089 centiliter per weeks.
centiliter per weeks = imperial gallon per seconds × 274947523.2
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial gallon per Seconds to Centiliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial gallon per Seconds (imp gal/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial gallon per seconds are in 1 centiliter per weeks?
1 centiliter per weeks equals 3.637058e-9 imperial gallon per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per weeks to imperial gallon per seconds?
Multiply the centiliter per weeks value by 3.637058e-9. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial gallon per seconds back to centiliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial gallon per seconds equals 274,947,523.2 centiliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per weeks?
Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial gallon per seconds?
Imperial gallon per Seconds (imp gal/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per weeks to imperial gallon per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per weeks and imperial gallon per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 3.637058e-9 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.