Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Weeks to Megaliters per Millisecond Converter — cL/wk to ML/ms
Convert Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) to Megaliter per Millisecond (ML/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per weeks = 1.653439e-17 megaliter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Weeks to Megaliters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-11 / 1e+6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Weeks to Megaliters per Millisecond
Centiliter per Weeks and Megaliter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
megaliters per millisecond = centiliter per weeks × 1.653439e-17
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-11 base units, and 1 megaliter per millisecond equals 1000000 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per weeks-to-megaliter per millisecond factor of 1.653439e-17.
Simple example
1 cL/wk × 1.653439e-17 = 1.653439e-17 ML/ms
1 centiliter per weeks = 1.653439e-17 megaliters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 cL/wk × 1.653439e-17 = 9.920635e-16 ML/ms
60 centiliter per weeks = 9.920635e-16 megaliters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) | Megaliter per Millisecond (ML/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/wk | 1.653439e-18 ML/ms |
| 1 cL/wk | 1.653439e-17 ML/ms |
| 10 cL/wk | 1.653439e-16 ML/ms |
| 60 cL/wk | 9.920635e-16 ML/ms |
| 100 cL/wk | 1.653439e-15 ML/ms |
| 1,000 cL/wk | 1.653439e-14 ML/ms |
Reverse conversion: Megaliter per Millisecond to Centiliter per Weeks
1.653439e-17 ML/ms × 6.048e+16 = 0.9999999072 cL/wk
1.653439e-17 megaliters per millisecond = 0.9999999072 centiliter per weeks.
centiliter per weeks = megaliters per millisecond × 6.048e+16
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Megaliter per Millisecond to Centiliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Megaliter per Millisecond (ML/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many megaliters per millisecond are in 1 centiliter per weeks?
1 centiliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-17 megaliters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per weeks to megaliter per millisecond?
Multiply the centiliter per weeks value by 1.653439e-17. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert megaliter per millisecond back to centiliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 megaliter per millisecond equals 6.048e+16 centiliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per weeks?
Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a megaliter per millisecond?
Megaliter per Millisecond (ML/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per weeks to megaliter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per weeks and megaliter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1.653439e-17 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.