Centiliter per Weeks to Milliliter per Hours Converter — cL/wk to mL/h

Convert Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) to Milliliter per Hours (mL/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per weeks = 0.0595238095 milliliter per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.

Centiliter per Weeks to Milliliter per Hours converter

Converter

Flow Rate Converter

Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.

Result 1 centiliter per weeks = 0.0595238095 milliliter per hours
Advertisement Converter ad slot

Reserved below the result so the calculator remains usable.

From definition

Volumetric flow rate.

To definition

Volumetric flow rate.

Formula

Result = input x 1.65343915e-11 / 2.77777778e-10.

Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.

Advertisement Ad slot: content top (728x90)

Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.

About Converting Centiliter per Weeks to Milliliter per Hours

Centiliter per Weeks and Milliliter per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.

Formula

milliliter per hours = centiliter per weeks × 0.0595238095238

This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-11 base units, and 1 milliliter per hours equals 2.777778e-10 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per weeks-to-milliliter per hours factor of 0.0595238095238.

Simple example

1 cL/wk × 0.05952380952 = 0.0595238095 mL/h

1 centiliter per weeks = 0.0595238095 milliliter per hours.

Real-world example

60 cL/wk × 0.05952380952 = 3.571428571 mL/h

60 centiliter per weeks = 3.571428571 milliliter per hours.

Conversion table

Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk)Milliliter per Hours (mL/h)
0.1 cL/wk0.005952381 mL/h
1 cL/wk0.0595238095 mL/h
10 cL/wk0.5952380952 mL/h
60 cL/wk3.571428571 mL/h
100 cL/wk5.952380952 mL/h
1,000 cL/wk59.52380952 mL/h

Reverse conversion: Milliliter per Hours to Centiliter per Weeks

0.0595238095 mL/h × 16.8 = 0.9999999996 cL/wk

0.0595238095 milliliter per hours = 0.9999999996 centiliter per weeks.

centiliter per weeks = milliliter per hours × 16.8

For a page dedicated to this direction, see Milliliter per Hours to Centiliter per Weeks.

Understanding the Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk)

Volumetric flow rate.

Understanding the Milliliter per Hours (mL/h)

Volumetric flow rate.

Advertisement Ad slot: content middle (728x90)

Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.

Frequently asked questions

How many milliliter per hours are in 1 centiliter per weeks?

1 centiliter per weeks equals 0.0595238095 milliliter per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.

How do I convert centiliter per weeks to milliliter per hours?

Multiply the centiliter per weeks value by 0.05952380952. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.

How do I convert milliliter per hours back to centiliter per weeks?

Use the reverse factor: 1 milliliter per hours equals 16.8 centiliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.

What is a centiliter per weeks?

Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.

What is a milliliter per hours?

Milliliter per Hours (mL/h) is a unit of flow rate.

Is the centiliter per weeks to milliliter per hours conversion exact?

Yes. Both centiliter per weeks and milliliter per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.05952380952 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.

What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?

Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.