Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Weeks to Milliliters per Millisecond Converter — cL/wk to mL/ms
Convert Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) to Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per weeks = 1.653439e-8 milliliter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Weeks to Milliliters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-11 / 0.001.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Weeks to Milliliters per Millisecond
Centiliter per Weeks and Milliliter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
milliliters per millisecond = centiliter per weeks × 1.653439e-8
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-11 base units, and 1 milliliter per millisecond equals 0.001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per weeks-to-milliliter per millisecond factor of 1.653439e-8.
Simple example
1 cL/wk × 1.653439e-8 = 1.653439e-8 mL/ms
1 centiliter per weeks = 1.653439e-8 milliliters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 cL/wk × 1.653439e-8 = 9.920635e-7 mL/ms
60 centiliter per weeks = 9.920635e-7 milliliters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) | Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/wk | 1.653439e-9 mL/ms |
| 1 cL/wk | 1.653439e-8 mL/ms |
| 10 cL/wk | 1.653439e-7 mL/ms |
| 60 cL/wk | 9.920635e-7 mL/ms |
| 100 cL/wk | 0.0000016534 mL/ms |
| 1,000 cL/wk | 0.0000165344 mL/ms |
Reverse conversion: Milliliter per Millisecond to Centiliter per Weeks
1.653439e-8 mL/ms × 60480000 = 0.9999999072 cL/wk
1.653439e-8 milliliters per millisecond = 0.9999999072 centiliter per weeks.
centiliter per weeks = milliliters per millisecond × 60480000
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Milliliter per Millisecond to Centiliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many milliliters per millisecond are in 1 centiliter per weeks?
1 centiliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-8 milliliters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per weeks to milliliter per millisecond?
Multiply the centiliter per weeks value by 1.653439e-8. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert milliliter per millisecond back to centiliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 milliliter per millisecond equals 60,480,000 centiliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per weeks?
Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a milliliter per millisecond?
Milliliter per Millisecond (mL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per weeks to milliliter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per weeks and milliliter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1.653439e-8 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.