Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Weeks to Milliliter per Minutes Converter — cL/wk to mL/min
Convert Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) to Milliliter per Minutes (mL/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per weeks = 0.0009920635 milliliter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Weeks to Milliliter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-11 / 1.66666667e-8.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Weeks to Milliliter per Minutes
Centiliter per Weeks and Milliliter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
milliliter per minutes = centiliter per weeks × 0.000992063492063
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-11 base units, and 1 milliliter per minutes equals 1.666667e-8 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per weeks-to-milliliter per minutes factor of 0.000992063492063.
Simple example
1 cL/wk × 0.0009920634921 = 0.0009920635 mL/min
1 centiliter per weeks = 0.0009920635 milliliter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 cL/wk × 0.0009920634921 = 0.0595238095 mL/min
60 centiliter per weeks = 0.0595238095 milliliter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) | Milliliter per Minutes (mL/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/wk | 0.0000992063 mL/min |
| 1 cL/wk | 0.0009920635 mL/min |
| 10 cL/wk | 0.0099206349 mL/min |
| 60 cL/wk | 0.0595238095 mL/min |
| 100 cL/wk | 0.0992063492 mL/min |
| 1,000 cL/wk | 0.9920634921 mL/min |
Reverse conversion: Milliliter per Minutes to Centiliter per Weeks
0.0009920635 mL/min × 1008 = 1.000000008 cL/wk
0.0009920635 milliliter per minutes = 1.000000008 centiliter per weeks.
centiliter per weeks = milliliter per minutes × 1008
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Milliliter per Minutes to Centiliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Milliliter per Minutes (mL/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many milliliter per minutes are in 1 centiliter per weeks?
1 centiliter per weeks equals 0.0009920635 milliliter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per weeks to milliliter per minutes?
Multiply the centiliter per weeks value by 0.0009920634921. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert milliliter per minutes back to centiliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 milliliter per minutes equals 1,008 centiliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per weeks?
Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a milliliter per minutes?
Milliliter per Minutes (mL/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per weeks to milliliter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per weeks and milliliter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0009920634921 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.