Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Weeks to Imperial pint per Minutes Converter — cL/wk to imp pt/min
Convert Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) to Imperial pint per Minutes (imp pt/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per weeks = 0.0000017458 imperial pint per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Weeks to Imperial pint per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-11 / 9.47102083e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Weeks to Imperial pint per Minutes
Centiliter per Weeks and Imperial pint per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial pint per minutes = centiliter per weeks × 0.00000174578768491
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-11 base units, and 1 imperial pint per minutes equals 0.00000947102083333 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per weeks-to-imperial pint per minutes factor of 0.00000174578768491.
Simple example
1 cL/wk × 0.000001745787685 = 0.0000017458 imp pt/min
1 centiliter per weeks = 0.0000017458 imperial pint per minutes.
Real-world example
60 cL/wk × 0.000001745787685 = 0.0001047473 imp pt/min
60 centiliter per weeks = 0.0001047473 imperial pint per minutes.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) | Imperial pint per Minutes (imp pt/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/wk | 1.745788e-7 imp pt/min |
| 1 cL/wk | 0.0000017458 imp pt/min |
| 10 cL/wk | 0.0000174579 imp pt/min |
| 60 cL/wk | 0.0001047473 imp pt/min |
| 100 cL/wk | 0.0001745788 imp pt/min |
| 1,000 cL/wk | 0.0017457877 imp pt/min |
Reverse conversion: Imperial pint per Minutes to Centiliter per Weeks
0.0000017458 imp pt/min × 572807.34 = 1.000007054 cL/wk
0.0000017458 imperial pint per minutes = 1.000007054 centiliter per weeks.
centiliter per weeks = imperial pint per minutes × 572807.34
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial pint per Minutes to Centiliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial pint per Minutes (imp pt/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial pint per minutes are in 1 centiliter per weeks?
1 centiliter per weeks equals 0.0000017458 imperial pint per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per weeks to imperial pint per minutes?
Multiply the centiliter per weeks value by 0.000001745787685. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial pint per minutes back to centiliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial pint per minutes equals 572,807.34 centiliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per weeks?
Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial pint per minutes?
Imperial pint per Minutes (imp pt/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per weeks to imperial pint per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per weeks and imperial pint per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000001745787685 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.