Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Hours Converter — cL/wk to imp qt/h
Convert Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) to Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per weeks = 0.0000523736 imperial quart per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-11 / 3.15700694e-7.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Hours
Centiliter per Weeks and Imperial quart per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per hours = centiliter per weeks × 0.0000523736305474
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-11 base units, and 1 imperial quart per hours equals 3.157007e-7 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per weeks-to-imperial quart per hours factor of 0.0000523736305474.
Simple example
1 cL/wk × 0.00005237363055 = 0.0000523736 imp qt/h
1 centiliter per weeks = 0.0000523736 imperial quart per hours.
Real-world example
60 cL/wk × 0.00005237363055 = 0.0031424178 imp qt/h
60 centiliter per weeks = 0.0031424178 imperial quart per hours.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) | Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/wk | 0.0000052374 imp qt/h |
| 1 cL/wk | 0.0000523736 imp qt/h |
| 10 cL/wk | 0.0005237363 imp qt/h |
| 60 cL/wk | 0.0031424178 imp qt/h |
| 100 cL/wk | 0.0052373631 imp qt/h |
| 1,000 cL/wk | 0.0523736306 imp qt/h |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Hours to Centiliter per Weeks
0.0000523736 imp qt/h × 19093.578 = 0.9999994167 cL/wk
0.0000523736 imperial quart per hours = 0.9999994167 centiliter per weeks.
centiliter per weeks = imperial quart per hours × 19093.578
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Hours to Centiliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per hours are in 1 centiliter per weeks?
1 centiliter per weeks equals 0.0000523736 imperial quart per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per weeks to imperial quart per hours?
Multiply the centiliter per weeks value by 0.00005237363055. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per hours back to centiliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per hours equals 19,093.578 centiliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per weeks?
Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per hours?
Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per weeks to imperial quart per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per weeks and imperial quart per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00005237363055 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.