Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Seconds Converter — cL/wk to imp qt/s
Convert Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) to Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per weeks = 1.454823e-8 imperial quart per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-11 / 0.0011365225.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Weeks to Imperial quart per Seconds
Centiliter per Weeks and Imperial quart per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per seconds = centiliter per weeks × 1.454823e-8
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-11 base units, and 1 imperial quart per seconds equals 0.0011365225 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per weeks-to-imperial quart per seconds factor of 1.454823e-8.
Simple example
1 cL/wk × 1.454823e-8 = 1.454823e-8 imp qt/s
1 centiliter per weeks = 1.454823e-8 imperial quart per seconds.
Real-world example
60 cL/wk × 1.454823e-8 = 8.728938e-7 imp qt/s
60 centiliter per weeks = 8.728938e-7 imperial quart per seconds.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) | Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/wk | 1.454823e-9 imp qt/s |
| 1 cL/wk | 1.454823e-8 imp qt/s |
| 10 cL/wk | 1.454823e-7 imp qt/s |
| 60 cL/wk | 8.728938e-7 imp qt/s |
| 100 cL/wk | 0.0000014548 imp qt/s |
| 1,000 cL/wk | 0.0000145482 imp qt/s |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Seconds to Centiliter per Weeks
1.454823e-8 imp qt/s × 68736880.8 = 0.9999999514 cL/wk
1.454823e-8 imperial quart per seconds = 0.9999999514 centiliter per weeks.
centiliter per weeks = imperial quart per seconds × 68736880.8
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Seconds to Centiliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per seconds are in 1 centiliter per weeks?
1 centiliter per weeks equals 1.454823e-8 imperial quart per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per weeks to imperial quart per seconds?
Multiply the centiliter per weeks value by 1.454823e-8. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per seconds back to centiliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per seconds equals 68,736,880.8 centiliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per weeks?
Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per seconds?
Imperial quart per Seconds (imp qt/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per weeks to imperial quart per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per weeks and imperial quart per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1.454823e-8 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.