Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Days Converter — cL/wk to metric tsp/d
Convert Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) to Metric teaspoon per Days (metric tsp/d) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per weeks = 0.2857142857 metric teaspoon per days). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Days converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-11 / 5.78703704e-11.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Days
Centiliter per Weeks and Metric teaspoon per Days both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
metric teaspoon per days = centiliter per weeks × 0.285714285714
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-11 base units, and 1 metric teaspoon per days equals 5.787037e-11 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per weeks-to-metric teaspoon per days factor of 0.285714285714.
Simple example
1 cL/wk × 0.2857142857 = 0.2857142857 metric tsp/d
1 centiliter per weeks = 0.2857142857 metric teaspoon per days.
Real-world example
60 cL/wk × 0.2857142857 = 17.14285714 metric tsp/d
60 centiliter per weeks = 17.14285714 metric teaspoon per days.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) | Metric teaspoon per Days (metric tsp/d) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/wk | 0.0285714286 metric tsp/d |
| 1 cL/wk | 0.2857142857 metric tsp/d |
| 10 cL/wk | 2.857142857 metric tsp/d |
| 60 cL/wk | 17.14285714 metric tsp/d |
| 100 cL/wk | 28.57142857 metric tsp/d |
| 1,000 cL/wk | 285.7142857 metric tsp/d |
Reverse conversion: Metric teaspoon per Days to Centiliter per Weeks
0.2857142857 metric tsp/d × 3.5 = 1 cL/wk
0.2857142857 metric teaspoon per days = 1 centiliter per weeks.
centiliter per weeks = metric teaspoon per days × 3.5
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Metric teaspoon per Days to Centiliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Metric teaspoon per Days (metric tsp/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many metric teaspoon per days are in 1 centiliter per weeks?
1 centiliter per weeks equals 0.2857142857 metric teaspoon per days, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per weeks to metric teaspoon per days?
Multiply the centiliter per weeks value by 0.2857142857. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert metric teaspoon per days back to centiliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 metric teaspoon per days equals 3.5 centiliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per weeks?
Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a metric teaspoon per days?
Metric teaspoon per Days (metric tsp/d) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per weeks to metric teaspoon per days conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per weeks and metric teaspoon per days are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.2857142857 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.