Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Hours Converter — cL/wk to metric tsp/h
Convert Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) to Metric teaspoon per Hours (metric tsp/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per weeks = 0.0119047619 metric teaspoon per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.65343915e-11 / 1.38888889e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Hours
Centiliter per Weeks and Metric teaspoon per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
metric teaspoon per hours = centiliter per weeks × 0.0119047619048
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per weeks equals 1.653439e-11 base units, and 1 metric teaspoon per hours equals 1.388889e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per weeks-to-metric teaspoon per hours factor of 0.0119047619048.
Simple example
1 cL/wk × 0.0119047619 = 0.0119047619 metric tsp/h
1 centiliter per weeks = 0.0119047619 metric teaspoon per hours.
Real-world example
60 cL/wk × 0.0119047619 = 0.7142857143 metric tsp/h
60 centiliter per weeks = 0.7142857143 metric teaspoon per hours.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) | Metric teaspoon per Hours (metric tsp/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/wk | 0.0011904762 metric tsp/h |
| 1 cL/wk | 0.0119047619 metric tsp/h |
| 10 cL/wk | 0.119047619 metric tsp/h |
| 60 cL/wk | 0.7142857143 metric tsp/h |
| 100 cL/wk | 1.19047619 metric tsp/h |
| 1,000 cL/wk | 11.9047619 metric tsp/h |
Reverse conversion: Metric teaspoon per Hours to Centiliter per Weeks
0.0119047619 metric tsp/h × 84 = 0.9999999996 cL/wk
0.0119047619 metric teaspoon per hours = 0.9999999996 centiliter per weeks.
centiliter per weeks = metric teaspoon per hours × 84
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Metric teaspoon per Hours to Centiliter per Weeks.
Understanding the Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Metric teaspoon per Hours (metric tsp/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many metric teaspoon per hours are in 1 centiliter per weeks?
1 centiliter per weeks equals 0.0119047619 metric teaspoon per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per weeks to metric teaspoon per hours?
Multiply the centiliter per weeks value by 0.0119047619. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert metric teaspoon per hours back to centiliter per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 metric teaspoon per hours equals 84 centiliter per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per weeks?
Centiliter per Weeks (cL/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a metric teaspoon per hours?
Metric teaspoon per Hours (metric tsp/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per weeks to metric teaspoon per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per weeks and metric teaspoon per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0119047619 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.