Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeter per Days to Cubic foot per Years Converter — cm3/d to ft3/yr
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Days (cm3/d) to Cubic foot per Years (ft3/yr) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per days = 0.0128984172 cubic foot per years). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeter per Days to Cubic foot per Years converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.15740741e-11 / 8.97325147e-10.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Days to Cubic foot per Years
Cubic Centimeter per Days and Cubic foot per Years both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic foot per years = cubic centimeter per days × 0.01289841716
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per days equals 1.157407e-11 base units, and 1 cubic foot per years equals 8.973251e-10 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per days-to-cubic foot per years factor of 0.01289841716.
Simple example
1 cm3/d × 0.01289841716 = 0.0128984172 ft3/yr
1 cubic centimeter per days = 0.0128984172 cubic foot per years.
Real-world example
60 cm3/d × 0.01289841716 = 0.7739050296 ft3/yr
60 cubic centimeter per days = 0.7739050296 cubic foot per years.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Days (cm3/d) | Cubic foot per Years (ft3/yr) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/d | 0.0012898417 ft3/yr |
| 1 cm3/d | 0.0128984172 ft3/yr |
| 10 cm3/d | 0.1289841716 ft3/yr |
| 60 cm3/d | 0.7739050296 ft3/yr |
| 100 cm3/d | 1.289841716 ft3/yr |
| 1,000 cm3/d | 12.89841716 ft3/yr |
Reverse conversion: Cubic foot per Years to Cubic Centimeter per Days
0.0128984172 ft3/yr × 77.5288927 = 1.000000003 cm3/d
0.0128984172 cubic foot per years = 1.000000003 cubic centimeter per days.
cubic centimeter per days = cubic foot per years × 77.5288927001
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic foot per Years to Cubic Centimeter per Days.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Days (cm3/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Years (ft3/yr)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic foot per years are in 1 cubic centimeter per days?
1 cubic centimeter per days equals 0.0128984172 cubic foot per years, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per days to cubic foot per years?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per days value by 0.01289841716. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic foot per years back to cubic centimeter per days?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic foot per years equals 77.5288927 cubic centimeter per days. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per days?
Cubic Centimeter per Days (cm3/d) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic foot per years?
Cubic foot per Years (ft3/yr) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per days to cubic foot per years conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per days and cubic foot per years are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.01289841716 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.