Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeter per Decades to Teaspoon per Weeks Converter — cm3/decade to tsp/wk
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Decades (cm3/decade) to Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per decades = 0.0003888345 teaspoon per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeter per Decades to Teaspoon per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 3.16887385e-15 / 8.14967195e-12.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Decades to Teaspoon per Weeks
Cubic Centimeter per Decades and Teaspoon per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
teaspoon per weeks = cubic centimeter per decades × 0.000388834528697
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per decades equals 3.168874e-15 base units, and 1 teaspoon per weeks equals 8.149672e-12 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per decades-to-teaspoon per weeks factor of 0.000388834528697.
Simple example
1 cm3/decade × 0.0003888345287 = 0.0003888345 tsp/wk
1 cubic centimeter per decades = 0.0003888345 teaspoon per weeks.
Real-world example
60 cm3/decade × 0.0003888345287 = 0.0233300717 tsp/wk
60 cubic centimeter per decades = 0.0233300717 teaspoon per weeks.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Decades (cm3/decade) | Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/decade | 0.0000388835 tsp/wk |
| 1 cm3/decade | 0.0003888345 tsp/wk |
| 10 cm3/decade | 0.0038883453 tsp/wk |
| 60 cm3/decade | 0.0233300717 tsp/wk |
| 100 cm3/decade | 0.0388834529 tsp/wk |
| 1,000 cm3/decade | 0.3888345287 tsp/wk |
Reverse conversion: Teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Decades
0.0003888345 tsp/wk × 2571.788065 = 0.9999999262 cm3/decade
0.0003888345 teaspoon per weeks = 0.9999999262 cubic centimeter per decades.
cubic centimeter per decades = teaspoon per weeks × 2571.78806458
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Teaspoon per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Decades.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Decades (cm3/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many teaspoon per weeks are in 1 cubic centimeter per decades?
1 cubic centimeter per decades equals 0.0003888345 teaspoon per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per decades to teaspoon per weeks?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per decades value by 0.0003888345287. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert teaspoon per weeks back to cubic centimeter per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 teaspoon per weeks equals 2,571.788065 cubic centimeter per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per decades?
Cubic Centimeter per Decades (cm3/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a teaspoon per weeks?
Teaspoon per Weeks (tsp/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per decades to teaspoon per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per decades and teaspoon per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0003888345287 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.