Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeters per Fortnight to Bushel per Hours Converter — cm3/fn to bu/h
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight (cm3/fn) to Bushel per Hours (bu/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per fortnight = 8.445712e-8 bushel per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeters per Fortnight to Bushel per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.26719577e-13 / 9.7886306e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeters per Fortnight to Bushel per Hours
Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight and Bushel per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
bushel per hours = cubic centimeters per fortnight × 8.445712e-8
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-13 base units, and 1 bushel per hours equals 0.00000978863060191 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per fortnight-to-bushel per hours factor of 8.445712e-8.
Simple example
1 cm3/fn × 8.445712e-8 = 8.445712e-8 bu/h
1 cubic centimeter per fortnight = 8.445712e-8 bushel per hours.
Real-world example
60 cm3/fn × 8.445712e-8 = 0.0000050674 bu/h
60 cubic centimeters per fortnight = 0.0000050674 bushel per hours.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight (cm3/fn) | Bushel per Hours (bu/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/fn | 8.445712e-9 bu/h |
| 1 cm3/fn | 8.445712e-8 bu/h |
| 10 cm3/fn | 8.445712e-7 bu/h |
| 60 cm3/fn | 0.0000050674 bu/h |
| 100 cm3/fn | 0.0000084457 bu/h |
| 1,000 cm3/fn | 0.0000844571 bu/h |
Reverse conversion: Bushel per Hours to Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight
8.445712e-8 bu/h × 11840327.58 = 0.9999999669 cm3/fn
8.445712e-8 bushel per hours = 0.9999999669 cubic centimeters per fortnight.
cubic centimeters per fortnight = bushel per hours × 11840327.5761
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Bushel per Hours to Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight (cm3/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Bushel per Hours (bu/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many bushel per hours are in 1 cubic centimeter per fortnight?
1 cubic centimeter per fortnight equals 8.445712e-8 bushel per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per fortnight to bushel per hours?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per fortnight value by 8.445712e-8. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert bushel per hours back to cubic centimeter per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 bushel per hours equals 11,840,327.58 cubic centimeters per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per fortnight?
Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight (cm3/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a bushel per hours?
Bushel per Hours (bu/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per fortnight to bushel per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per fortnight and bushel per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 8.445712e-8 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.