Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeters per Fortnight to Bushel per Weeks Converter — cm3/fn to bu/wk
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight (cm3/fn) to Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per fortnight = 0.0000141888 bushel per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeters per Fortnight to Bushel per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.26719577e-13 / 5.82656583e-8.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeters per Fortnight to Bushel per Weeks
Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight and Bushel per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
bushel per weeks = cubic centimeters per fortnight × 0.0000141887966292
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-13 base units, and 1 bushel per weeks equals 5.826566e-8 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per fortnight-to-bushel per weeks factor of 0.0000141887966292.
Simple example
1 cm3/fn × 0.00001418879663 = 0.0000141888 bu/wk
1 cubic centimeter per fortnight = 0.0000141888 bushel per weeks.
Real-world example
60 cm3/fn × 0.00001418879663 = 0.0008513278 bu/wk
60 cubic centimeters per fortnight = 0.0008513278 bushel per weeks.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight (cm3/fn) | Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/fn | 0.0000014189 bu/wk |
| 1 cm3/fn | 0.0000141888 bu/wk |
| 10 cm3/fn | 0.000141888 bu/wk |
| 60 cm3/fn | 0.0008513278 bu/wk |
| 100 cm3/fn | 0.0014188797 bu/wk |
| 1,000 cm3/fn | 0.0141887966 bu/wk |
Reverse conversion: Bushel per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight
0.0000141888 bu/wk × 70478.14033 = 1.000000238 cm3/fn
0.0000141888 bushel per weeks = 1.000000238 cubic centimeters per fortnight.
cubic centimeters per fortnight = bushel per weeks × 70478.1403338
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Bushel per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight (cm3/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many bushel per weeks are in 1 cubic centimeter per fortnight?
1 cubic centimeter per fortnight equals 0.0000141888 bushel per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per fortnight to bushel per weeks?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per fortnight value by 0.00001418879663. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert bushel per weeks back to cubic centimeter per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 bushel per weeks equals 70,478.14033 cubic centimeters per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per fortnight?
Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight (cm3/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a bushel per weeks?
Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per fortnight to bushel per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per fortnight and bushel per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00001418879663 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.