Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeters per Fortnight to Cubic Meter per Weeks Converter — cm3/fn to m3/wk
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight (cm3/fn) to Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per fortnight = 5e-7 cubic meter per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeters per Fortnight to Cubic Meter per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.26719577e-13 / 1.65343915e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeters per Fortnight to Cubic Meter per Weeks
Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight and Cubic Meter per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic meter per weeks = cubic centimeters per fortnight × 5e-7
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-13 base units, and 1 cubic meter per weeks equals 0.00000165343915344 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per fortnight-to-cubic meter per weeks factor of 5e-7.
Simple example
1 cm3/fn × 5e-7 = 5e-7 m3/wk
1 cubic centimeter per fortnight = 5e-7 cubic meter per weeks.
Real-world example
60 cm3/fn × 5e-7 = 0.00003 m3/wk
60 cubic centimeters per fortnight = 0.00003 cubic meter per weeks.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight (cm3/fn) | Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/fn | 5e-8 m3/wk |
| 1 cm3/fn | 5e-7 m3/wk |
| 10 cm3/fn | 0.000005 m3/wk |
| 60 cm3/fn | 0.00003 m3/wk |
| 100 cm3/fn | 0.00005 m3/wk |
| 1,000 cm3/fn | 0.0005 m3/wk |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Meter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight
5e-7 m3/wk × 2000000 = 1 cm3/fn
5e-7 cubic meter per weeks = 1 cubic centimeters per fortnight.
cubic centimeters per fortnight = cubic meter per weeks × 2000000
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Meter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight (cm3/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic meter per weeks are in 1 cubic centimeter per fortnight?
1 cubic centimeter per fortnight equals 5e-7 cubic meter per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per fortnight to cubic meter per weeks?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per fortnight value by 5e-7. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic meter per weeks back to cubic centimeter per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic meter per weeks equals 2,000,000 cubic centimeters per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per fortnight?
Cubic Centimeter per Fortnight (cm3/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic meter per weeks?
Cubic Meter per Weeks (m3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per fortnight to cubic meter per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per fortnight and cubic meter per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 5e-7 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.