Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Centiliter per Seconds Converter — cm3/h to cL/s
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) to Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per hours = 0.0000277778 centiliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Centiliter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.77777778e-10 / 1e-5.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Centiliter per Seconds
Cubic Centimeter per Hours and Centiliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
centiliter per seconds = cubic centimeter per hours × 0.0000277777777778
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per hours equals 2.777778e-10 base units, and 1 centiliter per seconds equals 0.00001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per hours-to-centiliter per seconds factor of 0.0000277777777778.
Simple example
1 cm3/h × 0.00002777777778 = 0.0000277778 cL/s
1 cubic centimeter per hours = 0.0000277778 centiliter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 cm3/h × 0.00002777777778 = 0.0016666667 cL/s
60 cubic centimeter per hours = 0.0016666667 centiliter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) | Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/h | 0.0000027778 cL/s |
| 1 cm3/h | 0.0000277778 cL/s |
| 10 cm3/h | 0.0002777778 cL/s |
| 60 cm3/h | 0.0016666667 cL/s |
| 100 cm3/h | 0.0027777778 cL/s |
| 1,000 cm3/h | 0.0277777778 cL/s |
Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Seconds to Cubic Centimeter per Hours
0.0000277778 cL/s × 36000 = 1.0000008 cm3/h
0.0000277778 centiliter per seconds = 1.0000008 cubic centimeter per hours.
cubic centimeter per hours = centiliter per seconds × 36000
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Seconds to Cubic Centimeter per Hours.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many centiliter per seconds are in 1 cubic centimeter per hours?
1 cubic centimeter per hours equals 0.0000277778 centiliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per hours to centiliter per seconds?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per hours value by 0.00002777777778. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert centiliter per seconds back to cubic centimeter per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per seconds equals 36,000 cubic centimeter per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per hours?
Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a centiliter per seconds?
Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per hours to centiliter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per hours and centiliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00002777777778 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.