Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks Converter — cm3/h to cm3/wk
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per hours = 168 cubic centimeter per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.77777778e-10 / 1.65343915e-12.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Cubic Centimeter per Weeks
Cubic Centimeter per Hours and Cubic Centimeter per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeter per weeks = cubic centimeter per hours × 168
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per hours equals 2.777778e-10 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-12 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per hours-to-cubic centimeter per weeks factor of 168.
Simple example
1 cm3/h × 168 = 168 cm3/wk
1 cubic centimeter per hours = 168 cubic centimeter per weeks.
Real-world example
60 cm3/h × 168 = 10,080 cm3/wk
60 cubic centimeter per hours = 10,080 cubic centimeter per weeks.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) | Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/h | 16.8 cm3/wk |
| 1 cm3/h | 168 cm3/wk |
| 10 cm3/h | 1,680 cm3/wk |
| 60 cm3/h | 10,080 cm3/wk |
| 100 cm3/h | 16,800 cm3/wk |
| 1,000 cm3/h | 168,000 cm3/wk |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Hours
168 cm3/wk × 0.005952380952 = 1 cm3/h
168 cubic centimeter per weeks = 1 cubic centimeter per hours.
cubic centimeter per hours = cubic centimeter per weeks × 0.00595238095238
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Hours.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeter per weeks are in 1 cubic centimeter per hours?
1 cubic centimeter per hours equals 168 cubic centimeter per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per hours to cubic centimeter per weeks?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per hours value by 168. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per weeks back to cubic centimeter per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per weeks equals 0.005952381 cubic centimeter per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per hours?
Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per weeks?
Cubic Centimeter per Weeks (cm3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per hours to cubic centimeter per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per hours and cubic centimeter per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 168 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.