Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Decaliter per Seconds Converter — cm3/h to daL/s
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) to Decaliter per Seconds (daL/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per hours = 2.777778e-8 decaliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Decaliter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.77777778e-10 / 0.01.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Decaliter per Seconds
Cubic Centimeter per Hours and Decaliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
decaliter per seconds = cubic centimeter per hours × 2.777778e-8
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per hours equals 2.777778e-10 base units, and 1 decaliter per seconds equals 0.01 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per hours-to-decaliter per seconds factor of 2.777778e-8.
Simple example
1 cm3/h × 2.777778e-8 = 2.777778e-8 daL/s
1 cubic centimeter per hours = 2.777778e-8 decaliter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 cm3/h × 2.777778e-8 = 0.0000016667 daL/s
60 cubic centimeter per hours = 0.0000016667 decaliter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) | Decaliter per Seconds (daL/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/h | 2.777778e-9 daL/s |
| 1 cm3/h | 2.777778e-8 daL/s |
| 10 cm3/h | 2.777778e-7 daL/s |
| 60 cm3/h | 0.0000016667 daL/s |
| 100 cm3/h | 0.0000027778 daL/s |
| 1,000 cm3/h | 0.0000277778 daL/s |
Reverse conversion: Decaliter per Seconds to Cubic Centimeter per Hours
2.777778e-8 daL/s × 36000000 = 1.00000008 cm3/h
2.777778e-8 decaliter per seconds = 1.00000008 cubic centimeter per hours.
cubic centimeter per hours = decaliter per seconds × 36000000
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Decaliter per Seconds to Cubic Centimeter per Hours.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Decaliter per Seconds (daL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many decaliter per seconds are in 1 cubic centimeter per hours?
1 cubic centimeter per hours equals 2.777778e-8 decaliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per hours to decaliter per seconds?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per hours value by 2.777778e-8. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert decaliter per seconds back to cubic centimeter per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 decaliter per seconds equals 36,000,000 cubic centimeter per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per hours?
Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a decaliter per seconds?
Decaliter per Seconds (daL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per hours to decaliter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per hours and decaliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 2.777778e-8 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.