Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Liters per Millisecond Converter — cm3/h to L/ms
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) to Liter per Millisecond (L/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per hours = 2.777778e-10 liter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Liters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.77777778e-10 / 1.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Liters per Millisecond
Cubic Centimeter per Hours and Liter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
liters per millisecond = cubic centimeter per hours × 2.777778e-10
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per hours equals 2.777778e-10 base units, and 1 liter per millisecond equals 1 base unit, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per hours-to-liter per millisecond factor of 2.777778e-10.
Simple example
1 cm3/h × 2.777778e-10 = 2.777778e-10 L/ms
1 cubic centimeter per hours = 2.777778e-10 liters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 cm3/h × 2.777778e-10 = 1.666667e-8 L/ms
60 cubic centimeter per hours = 1.666667e-8 liters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) | Liter per Millisecond (L/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/h | 2.777778e-11 L/ms |
| 1 cm3/h | 2.777778e-10 L/ms |
| 10 cm3/h | 2.777778e-9 L/ms |
| 60 cm3/h | 1.666667e-8 L/ms |
| 100 cm3/h | 2.777778e-8 L/ms |
| 1,000 cm3/h | 2.777778e-7 L/ms |
Reverse conversion: Liter per Millisecond to Cubic Centimeter per Hours
2.777778e-10 L/ms × 3600000000 = 1.00000008 cm3/h
2.777778e-10 liters per millisecond = 1.00000008 cubic centimeter per hours.
cubic centimeter per hours = liters per millisecond × 3600000000
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Liter per Millisecond to Cubic Centimeter per Hours.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Liter per Millisecond (L/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many liters per millisecond are in 1 cubic centimeter per hours?
1 cubic centimeter per hours equals 2.777778e-10 liters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per hours to liter per millisecond?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per hours value by 2.777778e-10. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert liter per millisecond back to cubic centimeter per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 liter per millisecond equals 3,600,000,000 cubic centimeter per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per hours?
Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a liter per millisecond?
Liter per Millisecond (L/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per hours to liter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per hours and liter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 2.777778e-10 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.