Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Imperial pint per Weeks Converter — cm3/h to imp pt/wk
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) to Imperial pint per Weeks (imp pt/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per hours = 0.2956386697 imperial pint per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Imperial pint per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.77777778e-10 / 9.395854e-10.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Imperial pint per Weeks
Cubic Centimeter per Hours and Imperial pint per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial pint per weeks = cubic centimeter per hours × 0.295638669714
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per hours equals 2.777778e-10 base units, and 1 imperial pint per weeks equals 9.395854e-10 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per hours-to-imperial pint per weeks factor of 0.295638669714.
Simple example
1 cm3/h × 0.2956386697 = 0.2956386697 imp pt/wk
1 cubic centimeter per hours = 0.2956386697 imperial pint per weeks.
Real-world example
60 cm3/h × 0.2956386697 = 17.73832018 imp pt/wk
60 cubic centimeter per hours = 17.73832018 imperial pint per weeks.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) | Imperial pint per Weeks (imp pt/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/h | 0.029563867 imp pt/wk |
| 1 cm3/h | 0.2956386697 imp pt/wk |
| 10 cm3/h | 2.956386697 imp pt/wk |
| 60 cm3/h | 17.73832018 imp pt/wk |
| 100 cm3/h | 29.56386697 imp pt/wk |
| 1,000 cm3/h | 295.6386697 imp pt/wk |
Reverse conversion: Imperial pint per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Hours
0.2956386697 imp pt/wk × 3.38250744 = 1 cm3/h
0.2956386697 imperial pint per weeks = 1 cubic centimeter per hours.
cubic centimeter per hours = imperial pint per weeks × 3.38250744048
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial pint per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Hours.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial pint per Weeks (imp pt/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial pint per weeks are in 1 cubic centimeter per hours?
1 cubic centimeter per hours equals 0.2956386697 imperial pint per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per hours to imperial pint per weeks?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per hours value by 0.2956386697. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial pint per weeks back to cubic centimeter per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial pint per weeks equals 3.38250744 cubic centimeter per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per hours?
Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial pint per weeks?
Imperial pint per Weeks (imp pt/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per hours to imperial pint per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per hours and imperial pint per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.2956386697 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.