Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Quart per Weeks Converter — cm3/h to qt/wk

Convert Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) to Quart per Weeks (qt/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per hours = 0.1775236192 quart per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.

Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Quart per Weeks converter

Converter

Flow Rate Converter

Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.

Result 1 cubic centimeter per hours = 0.1775236192 quart per weeks
Advertisement Converter ad slot

Reserved below the result so the calculator remains usable.

From definition

Volumetric flow rate.

To definition

Volumetric flow rate.

Formula

Result = input x 2.77777778e-10 / 1.56473701e-9.

Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.

Advertisement Ad slot: content top (728x90)

Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.

About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Quart per Weeks

Cubic Centimeter per Hours and Quart per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.

Formula

quart per weeks = cubic centimeter per hours × 0.177523619185

This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per hours equals 2.777778e-10 base units, and 1 quart per weeks equals 1.564737e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per hours-to-quart per weeks factor of 0.177523619185.

Simple example

1 cm3/h × 0.1775236192 = 0.1775236192 qt/wk

1 cubic centimeter per hours = 0.1775236192 quart per weeks.

Real-world example

60 cm3/h × 0.1775236192 = 10.65141715 qt/wk

60 cubic centimeter per hours = 10.65141715 quart per weeks.

Conversion table

Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h)Quart per Weeks (qt/wk)
0.1 cm3/h0.0177523619 qt/wk
1 cm3/h0.1775236192 qt/wk
10 cm3/h1.775236192 qt/wk
60 cm3/h10.65141715 qt/wk
100 cm3/h17.75236192 qt/wk
1,000 cm3/h177.5236192 qt/wk

Reverse conversion: Quart per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Hours

0.1775236192 qt/wk × 5.63305325 = 1 cm3/h

0.1775236192 quart per weeks = 1 cubic centimeter per hours.

cubic centimeter per hours = quart per weeks × 5.63305325

For a page dedicated to this direction, see Quart per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Hours.

Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h)

Volumetric flow rate.

Understanding the Quart per Weeks (qt/wk)

Volumetric flow rate.

Advertisement Ad slot: content middle (728x90)

Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.

Frequently asked questions

How many quart per weeks are in 1 cubic centimeter per hours?

1 cubic centimeter per hours equals 0.1775236192 quart per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.

How do I convert cubic centimeter per hours to quart per weeks?

Multiply the cubic centimeter per hours value by 0.1775236192. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.

How do I convert quart per weeks back to cubic centimeter per hours?

Use the reverse factor: 1 quart per weeks equals 5.63305325 cubic centimeter per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.

What is a cubic centimeter per hours?

Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) is a unit of flow rate.

What is a quart per weeks?

Quart per Weeks (qt/wk) is a unit of flow rate.

Is the cubic centimeter per hours to quart per weeks conversion exact?

Yes. Both cubic centimeter per hours and quart per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.1775236192 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.

What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?

Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.