Volumetric flow rate.
Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Metric tablespoon per Weeks Converter — cm3/h to metric tbsp/wk
Convert Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) to Metric tablespoon per Weeks (metric tbsp/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 cubic centimeter per hours = 11.2 metric tablespoon per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Metric tablespoon per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.77777778e-10 / 2.48015873e-11.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Metric tablespoon per Weeks
Cubic Centimeter per Hours and Metric tablespoon per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
metric tablespoon per weeks = cubic centimeter per hours × 11.2
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 cubic centimeter per hours equals 2.777778e-10 base units, and 1 metric tablespoon per weeks equals 2.480159e-11 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct cubic centimeter per hours-to-metric tablespoon per weeks factor of 11.2.
Simple example
1 cm3/h × 11.2 = 11.2 metric tbsp/wk
1 cubic centimeter per hours = 11.2 metric tablespoon per weeks.
Real-world example
60 cm3/h × 11.2 = 672 metric tbsp/wk
60 cubic centimeter per hours = 672 metric tablespoon per weeks.
Conversion table
| Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) | Metric tablespoon per Weeks (metric tbsp/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cm3/h | 1.12 metric tbsp/wk |
| 1 cm3/h | 11.2 metric tbsp/wk |
| 10 cm3/h | 112 metric tbsp/wk |
| 60 cm3/h | 672 metric tbsp/wk |
| 100 cm3/h | 1,120 metric tbsp/wk |
| 1,000 cm3/h | 11,200 metric tbsp/wk |
Reverse conversion: Metric tablespoon per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Hours
11.2 metric tbsp/wk × 0.08928571429 = 1 cm3/h
11.2 metric tablespoon per weeks = 1 cubic centimeter per hours.
cubic centimeter per hours = metric tablespoon per weeks × 0.0892857142857
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Metric tablespoon per Weeks to Cubic Centimeter per Hours.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Metric tablespoon per Weeks (metric tbsp/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many metric tablespoon per weeks are in 1 cubic centimeter per hours?
1 cubic centimeter per hours equals 11.2 metric tablespoon per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per hours to metric tablespoon per weeks?
Multiply the cubic centimeter per hours value by 11.2. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert metric tablespoon per weeks back to cubic centimeter per hours?
Use the reverse factor: 1 metric tablespoon per weeks equals 0.0892857143 cubic centimeter per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a cubic centimeter per hours?
Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a metric tablespoon per weeks?
Metric tablespoon per Weeks (metric tbsp/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the cubic centimeter per hours to metric tablespoon per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both cubic centimeter per hours and metric tablespoon per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 11.2 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.